Part One - The Original Series Cast
|
"So a Klingon, a Romulan and a Vulcan walk into
a bar..." |
It is hard to argue
Star Trek's legacy within pop culture. It’s characters and universe have endured almost as long as James Bond. Every time I think we can count
the franchise as down and out, along comes a new incarnation to bring it back
to whole new group of fans yearning to explore strange new worlds.
One of the interesting things about the franchise is that
its longevity is due in large part to the success of the feature films that
were released starting in 1979 with
StarTrek: The Motion Picture. While the television series is where the
franchise started, if the films were not as successful as they were,
Star Trek would be a fondly remembered
relic of the 1960s.
In addition, we can see how Paramount, the studio that owns
Star Trek, feels about the series
depending on how they approach the films.
|
I think Decker wants his chair back. |
In this two part blog, I’ll take a look at the ways the
films were impacted by and impacted the franchise, and why they are important to
its legacy. I won’t be going into too much detail on my thoughts on the films,
but I will discuss critical reception (and perception of that reception) and how that affected the films.
The original series ended in 1969 after three seasons. While it was popular among science fiction fans, it never really exploded in
popularity during its run. Instead
Star Trek got
syndicated and that is where the fanbase really started to grow. During the
1970s it was hard to avoid a rerun of
Star
Trek and even growing up in the 1980s, it felt like the
series was always around.
|
Wait! There was a cat girl in Star Trek the Animated
Series! Sign me up! |
An animated series followed in 1973 and 1974 that expanded
the voyages a little bit, and allowed the writers to take the series in
directions that would have been impossible with live action.
All this exposure of
Star Trek in the 70s inspired
Paramount to look into creating a new series of adventures with the same crew
for
Phase II. Production started and
then a little movie called
Star Wars
erupted onto the screens, and suddenly Paramount shifted gears to turn
Star Trek into a film franchise.
The increased the budget to a whopping 35 million dollars (of 1970s money). They pulled in acclaimed director
Robert Wise and got their marketing into high gear. This was the turning point.
If Star Trek: The Motion Picture was
a failure, than the franchise was dead.
|
The moons of Vulcan are affecting her mind! |
Critical and general response was average. But the combined fanbase of the 60s and 70s had been thirsting for new
Star Trek adventures, and they went back to the theaters over and over again to see the film. For all it’s faults
The
Motion Picture has a huge visual scope, impressive visual effects and a
wonderful soundtrack by Jerry Goldsmith. Seeing it in the theater is a real
experience (one I actually had the pleasure of revisiting in 2012). There was
also a frenzy of interest in space adventures because of
Star Wars, so I bet a lot of little kids dragged their parents to
see the film. In the end,
the Motion
Picture was a financial success.
Paramount felt confident in continuing the series as a film
franchise, and moved forward producing Star
Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. But they reduced the budget to a little over 11 million, and
asked director Nicholas Meyer to make sure there was more action in the film (a
criticsm of the previous film they wanted to avoid). Meyere delivered a film
that is more visceral, goes back to the roots of the original series, and
cranks up the action with some excellent visual effects and high stakes. The Wrath of Khan was an immediate hit,
with excellent critical response and fan approval. It also did very well on
VHS, a new medium that studios were just beginning to explore in 1982.
|
"Is that a giant worm in your hand, or are you just
happy to see me?" |
So Paramount kept the same focus when it came to
The Search for Spock in 1984. Once
again the budget was increased to 17 million. But the
focus on characters and the quest to bring Spock back to life helped pull viewers in the theaters to find out how it was all going to shake out. Director Leonard
Nimoy obviously knew the series inside and out, and crafted a solid follow up
to the previous movie. The film got average critical response and most people
enjoyed it well enough. But the film had a dark undertone that surprised many
viewers.
|
Do you think he's using colorful metaphors here? |
Gears were shifted in the storytelling for the next film,
Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. Nimoy
was back at the helm and the budget was given a bit of a boost (to 25 million) for some really
impressive visual effects by Industrial Light and Magic. But the script
involving time travel, saving the whales, and the crew interacting with the
denizens of San Francisco circa 1986 was a blast. It was a fun movie with
plenty of laughs and adventure all mixed together. Critical response was full
of praise. But it was the success of the film with a wider audience that gave
Paramount a view of what a successful
Star
Trek franchise could be. This was the most financial successful
Star Trek film until the reboot in
2009.
In 1987, Star Trek:
The Next Generation arrived on television screens. It was a new cast, new
starship, hell it was a new century! Paramount understood that in order for the
franchise to continue it would need to evolve. To do this, they needed to
inject it with new blood creatively. Obviously the film franchise was still
profitable, but a new television series could create new fans and lead to a new
series of films.
|
It is like that Depeche Mode song, reach out and touch
face. |
1989 brought the first good season of
The Next Generation after its rocky start over the first two
seasons. Meanwhile Paramount attempted to strike gold in the theaters again
with William Shatner directing
Star Trek
V: The Final Frontier. Unfortunately the film was plagued with production
issues, and arguments over the direction and tone of the script.
Shatner wanted to go darker and more intense. Paramount wanted to keep it light
and fun. The end result was a film that was critical and financial failure.
Fans disliked the film for a whole host of reasons and rumor is that even Gene
Roddenberry felt the film was not part of the official cannon. The movie also
had the unfortunate release during one of the most crowded years in movie
history.
Batman,
Ghostbusters 2, Indiana Jones and the Last
Crusade and
Back to the Future Part
2 were all battling for seats in the multiplexes. Someone had to lose and
Star Trek “won” that honor. While it did eventually recoup it's 28 million dollar budget, no one was really pleased with the final film.
|
"No, it's not Tribbles. The joke only works if
the Klingon asks the bartender first." |
This did set off alarms at Paramount. They wondered if the
aging cast was losing their audience appeal. But they also learned some
lessons. Budget cutting your special effects heavy films is not a good option.
So they turned back to Nicholas Meyer who did so well with
The Wrath of Khan to helm
Star
Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country. In a cunning bit of synergy, the plot for
the film directly impacted events in
The
Next Generation episodes
Unification
with Nimoy making a special appareance as Spock in the two-part adventure. Meyer brought back high stakes, tension and excitement to the
series. The plot was inspired by world events, and with the increased budget (to 30 million) the movie looked great. Meyer’s script balances humor and tension better than
the previous film did. Even with all that, the movie was also declared the
final voyage of the full cast from The Original Series. All those elements
stirred together made
The Undiscovered
Country a critical and financial success in 1991.
It was a win for Paramount and the franchise. But everyone
knew it was time to switch gears.
In
part two of this post, I take a look at the trails and Tribble-ations of the films featuring the case of
The Next Generation and
Beyond...
|
"Just imagine it. We are all animated, and there's
a cat girl in a red uniform! That is my vision." |
I’m one of those original viewers beginning in 1966, which probably makes me inordinately fond of the original series. All considered, TOS has aged fairly well, but no more than fairly. Viewers do have to make allowances for its era. Also, many details later taken for granted about the Star Trek universe were still being worked out, and some were later contradicted. It doesn’t evoke the chuckles of Flash Gordon (original serials), of course; some pretty good scripts see to that. The first film revitalized the franchise, as you say, and there is some irony in Star Wars having had an indirect hand in that. In addition to TOS, I’m also inordinately fond of The Wrath of Khan, not only on its own merits but because I saw it in the theater on a date that went rather well. Reason enough.
ReplyDeleteYeah I grew up with this crew too. I've mentioned before that my Grandmother used to watch it all the time when she lived with us, and that just made it a staple in our house. It always seemed to be on. I eventually warmed up to TNG cast. But TOS will always be my favorite. I'm revisiting the series now, and I'm surprised how many really great stories are in that first season. I really starts out very strong (especially compared to TNG's very rocky start).
Delete