Showing posts with label 1990. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1990. Show all posts

Friday, April 6, 2018

Score Sample: Quigley Down Under (1990)

It has been a while since I featured some music from the Western genre on this blog. I'm not a big fan of Western films in general. There are some good ones out there for sure, but as a whole they just don't do too much for me.

But the music is another story all together. There have been plenty of great scores for Western films. Of course Ennio Morricone leaps to mind with his scores to The Good, The Bad and the Ugly and many other spaghetti westerns. But you also have classic Hollywood Westerns featuring scores by Alfred Newman, Elmer Bernstein and of course Jerry Goldsmith.

But I'm gong for something a bit more recent. Basil Poledouris is best known for his wonderful score to Conan the Barbarian, but the composer became one of the few who kept getting pulled into scoring the few Westerns that came out in the 80s and 90s. One of my favorites from Poledouris is the score to Quigley Down Under. It has the classic Hollywood Western sound in the main theme, but Poledouris adds some banjo and ragtime rhythms to the piece that just makes it super memorable. The whole score is a lot of fun, but seriously the main theme is one of the best of the 1990s.

So enjoy the Main Title from Quigley Down Under composed by Basil Poledouris.


Friday, April 7, 2017

Score Sample: Twin Peaks (1990)

I don't share nearly enough jazzy music on this blog. But I do enjoy the occasional jazzy film score. I think I owe that appreciation of jazzy scores enjoying the music from the television series Twin Peaks. I haven't blogged much about my fandom of David Lynch, but yeah, I pretty much love everything he's directed. I even find merit in his flawed take on Dune.

One of the key elements of any David Lynch production is the creation of mood. With Twin Peaks Lynch brought along his frequent musical collaborator Angelo Badalamenti. The sound they created for the show was a mix of 50's rockabilly, smooth jazz, dream pop, and eerie synths. Nothing else quite sounds like the musical world of Twin Peaks, and if you've ever watched a few episodes of the show, you'll know it when you hear it.

I'm going to avoid the obvious cuts from the show and share one of my favorite tracks, which makes its dreamlike appearance in the third episode of the series. It focuses more on the jazzy end of the score. Enjoy The Dance of the Dream Man from Twin Peaks by Angelo Badalamenti.


Monday, November 7, 2016

Anime Juke Box - Adesso e Fortuna - Record of Lodoss War

You know at some point I really need to do a proper review of Record of Lodoss War, one of the best fantasy adventure stories brought to the screen in the 1990s. This Japanese animated series took all the classic Dungeons and Dragons archetypes and tropes and blended them in one epic saga of animated adventure. These days the plot looks really standard and unoriginal, but back in the 1990s I had never seen those classic D&D characters and storylines brought to life in such a entertaining way.

The music for the series was mostly done on synths standing in for orchestra for budget reasons. Still there are plenty of medieval and renaissance style tracks in the score, as well as pure late 80s synths. The opening and ending themes were J-pop of course, but done in a way that actually fit the tone of the series. In most anime you have the perky poppy song as the opening and the more serious song as the end credits, but Record of Lodoss War reversed that. I did my best to find the Japanese song version of the opening track Adesso e Fortuna sung by Sherry. But all I could find was the English dub, not bad, but not great. It was an early dub from CPM and they were all over the place.

I did find a wonderful cover of the instrumental version featuring a piano and cello. Seriously these two pretty much nailed the sound and feel of the version on the CD. So enjoy some fans performing this anime classic.


Wednesday, October 7, 2015

Score Sample: Nightbreed

Well it is October again, and that means I need to post some kind of spooky or chilling music on this blog. I've been providing samples of Goldsmith and Young the last couple of years, but one man who is really a specialist in the gothic and macabre sound I've missed completely. Time to rectify that. Danny Elfman has been working in the film industry since the mid 1980s. And while I will always love his work with the rock group OIngo Boingo, his film scores are really something else. He is most famous these days for his amazing partnership with Tim Burton, but I wanted to spotlight something a little different here.

He worked with Clive Barker on a horror film early in his career, and its got that Elfman sound but feels a bit more savage and fun. Check out this suite of cues for Nightbreed.



Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Tales from the Darkside: The Movie (1990)

Introduction:
When I was a kid, I had a friend who was a horror fiend. This guy loved anything with monsters, blood, guts and ghosts. He had a subscription to the magazine Fangoria, and that is pretty much what I remember most clearly about this movie. He was showing me a whole article on the creature creations for the film, especially the gargoyles. I didn’t see the film till much later, and had forgotten all about it. When it appeared on Netflix, I decided to give it a revisit.

Summary:
That’s right it is time for another horror movie anthology. The wrap around story features a kid (Matthew Lawrence) trying to escape a witch played by Debbie Harry. He starts telling her stories, Arabian Nights style to distract her from cooking him. The first story is about a nerdy college kid played by Steve Buscemei who obtains a mummy. Of course the mummy is cursed, but Buscemei can control the thing, and he starts taking revenge against those that wronged him. Christian Slater and Julianne Moore play fellow students.

Gears shift to tale penned by Stephen King and George A. Romero.  In this tale a rich old bastard played with glee by William Hickey, hires a hit man played by David Johansen to assassinate his arch nemesis. This nemesis happens to be a black cat that is very capable, and is more than willing to show these two jokers who is boss. The final story revolves around a down on his luck artist (James Remar) who meets a lovely woman played by Rae Dawn Chong. Let’s just say that this dark city has more secrets than I can tell you right now, but its safe to say that the dark wings you see in the night don’t belong to bats… or batman. This can only be described as one of the Tales from the Darkside.

Good Points:
  • Some fun performances from familiar faces
  • Some really cool practical and make up effects.
  • A couple of the stories have a creepy atmosphere

Bad Points:
  • The scripts are really a mixed bag
  • Never gets really scary or spooky
  • The cat story works fine on paper but feels off-putting or silly visually

Overall:
Horror anthologies are tough to get right. And yeah this one makes a strong effort, but never quite gels. None of the individual stories is better than the others. But all of them have neat or clever moments combined with bizarre or weak elements. It entertains, but you keep wishing for a bit more: better characters, better plot twists, or maybe just replacing that cat story with something better. The final result passes time, but you might be better off watching Creepshow again.

Scores (out of 5)
Visuals: 4
Sound: 3
Acting: 3
Script: 3
Music: 3
Direction: 3
Entertainment: 3
Total:  3


Curious about a full review, sent me an email and I’ll make additional thoughts to this review.

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Hamlet (1990)

Introduction:
You know what is kinda weird when you look back at it? The 1990s gave a little renaissance of Shakespeare adaptations. I’m not sure if this all started because of Kenneth Branagh’s wonderful adaptation of Henry V in 1989, or maybe because independent studios were flourishing. Who else but an independent studio was going to take a chance on a Shakespeare adaptation? Well Mel Gibson would. Who would have thought? Franco Zeffirelli apparently.

Summary:
So stop me if you’ve heard this story. Prince Hamlet (Mel Gibson) has a major case of depression because his father has died. To add to this, his mother Gertrude (Glenn Close) has remarried the new king Claudius (Alan Bates), who was her brother in law. Ouch. Then the ghost of Hamlet’s father (Paul Scofield) appears and tells him the horrible truth: Claudius killed him to steal the crown!

Hamlet desires revenge, but must tread carefully. So he feigns insanity to hide his plotting. Unfortunately his sweetheart Ophelia (Helena Bonham Carter) doesn’t know that to make of this, even though her father Polonius (Ian Holm) has some definite ideas. Eventually tempers will flair, rash and bloody deeds will abound and poison will be imbibed. The only question at the end of all this is whether Hamlet will get his revenge.

Good Points:
  • Some solid and excellent acting by the whole cast
  • Amazing details in set and costumes bring the medieval setting to life
  • The film moves at a quick pace building up to the finale

Bad Points:
  • Purists beware, this version of the play has been trimmed and edited to suit film and modern storytelling conventions
  • Sticks with the standard interpretation of characters and events
  • Gibson goes a bit over the top at times

Overall:
This version of Hamlet focuses on the story and making the most crowd friendly version of the story. The film drives forward as Hamlet moves from key scene to key scene but with some dialogue (and monologues) moved around, and some scenes shifted or omitted completely. Production elements are wonderful and some of the camera work and visuals are masterful. But this film version will appeal more to people who don’t take every word Shakespeare wrote as gospel. Well worth seeing for some excellent performances and the visual style Zeffirelli brings to the movie.

Scores (out of 5)
Visuals: 5
Sound: 3
Acting: 4
Script: 4
Music: 4
Direction: 5
Entertainment: 5
Total:  4

In Depth Review

Alas poor William Wallace?
In some ways I think this movie has been forgotten. I remember when it came out there was a huge buzz about Gibson playing Hamlet, because most viewers only knew Mel from his roles in Mad Max and Lethal Weapon. But this movie really showed audiences that Gibson had acting skill, and that he wanted to do more than action flicks. Hamlet was as much an adaptation of a classic as it was a defining moment in Gibson’s career. So when Braveheart came around, we knew Gibson could carry a historical drama.

Because really that is what Zeffirelli has given us, Hamlet as a straight up historical drama. This is not a delving into the text, like the Kenneth Branagh version, or a modern revision like the version Ethan Hawke starred in. This is the bard’s play streamlined down into its basic plot, with everything clearly mapped and executed. If you are open to that concept, then you’ll enjoy the film. If you feel that Shakespeare is all about the language and the subtext, then you’ll find this film disappointing.

Polonius explains it all.
It’s a shame to write this movie off because of that perception, because there is a wealth of good performances in this film. Alan Bates brings a dangerous cunning to Claudius. I love Ian Holm’s stuffy and befuddled take on Polonius, a bit of humor in a dark story. Carter brings frailty to Ophelia, so that when we see her break down into madness, it is believable and touching. Paul Scofield brings gravitas to the role of Hamlet’s father. Even small but key roles of Horatio (Stephen Dillane) and Laertes (Nathaniel Parker) are well acted.

If I have any criticism it is with Gibson and Close. Gibson tries his hardest and that may be the problem. When he is on, he’s very good. Hamlet’s melancholy and anguish feel real and palpable. But there are moments where his rage seems too fiery and too intense. Hamlet is a thinker, not a man of action. I always felt he had a slow burning cold rage. Still it is a minor issue and for the most part Gibson delivers in the role.

This scene goes into whole weird area.
Close does a fine job too. But there are a few moments where I’m not sure if she takes the incest angle a bit too far. You almost get the feeling that Gertrude is lusting for her son as well. It is an odd acting choice and one that Gibson seems to play into at times. Aside from those odd moments, Close does a good job, especially when she starts to lose faith in Claudius.

One of the main reasons to see Zeffirelli’s version of Hamlet is his visual presentation of the story. He keeps the setting of medieval Denmark, with it’s cold dark castle, broadswords and earth colors. David Watkin’s cinematography uses shadows and natural light to amazing effect. Location shooting in Scotland and Kent provides some amazing backdrops to the action. During the burial scene for Ophelia, the vibrant green grass contrasts with the pale white skin of the dead girl and the black outfits of the mourners. But it is the darkness of the castle that seems to swallow Hamlet and many of the other characters up. Warm torchlight or candlelight provides pools where characters seem to be isolated from the background and each other. It really is a wonderful look, something Zeffirelli excelled at in his version of Romeo and Juliet back in 1968.

Ophelia is shocked to see she isn't in a Tim Burton movie.
Speaking of the previous Zeffirelli film, Romeo and Juliet featured a wonderful score by the gifted Italian composer, Nino Rota (who also gave us the music from The Godfather). This time Zeffirelli turned to another Italian film music master, Ennio Morricone. For Hamlet, Morricone keeps things dark and moody, matching the visuals of the film. The music fits the movie well, but it is actually sparsely used, coming in only when it is really needed. The final result is a score that doesn’t really stand out, but always works well within the film. Composer Patrick Doyle took a very similar approach (but with a less heavy style) when he worked with Branagh on the 1996 version of the film.

I’ve seen many Shakespeare fans deride this film for all the changes to the script and scenes. To them, the Bard is untouchable. But I think the film that Zeffirelli constructed here works wonderful as a straight film. The pacing is perfect, and actually builds up to the climax with each scene feeling like it adds to the momentum. Compare this to the Branagh version, which is the entire play filmed in its entirety. Branagh’s film moves in fits and starts, even though the energy is high and the acting impeccable. But the goals of the two films are very different. And I actually enjoy both of them for different reasons.


Hamlet watches for the conscience  of the king.
Zeffirelli gives us a Hamlet that is easy to digest, and is very accessible to anyone new to the story. It gives you a taste of all the key elements, all the important speeches and dialogue, all the character interaction. It never really delves into some of the more offbeat interpretations I’ve seen in other films or productions, but plays things very straight (with the excepting being Gertrude’s odd moments). To me this is the perfect version for students studying this for the first time in Lit class. But it also works as a version of Hamlet that you can just throw on when the mood strikes, and you can enjoy for all its visual splendor as well as its entertaining story. This is far from the dud, that some reviewers make it out to be. Believe me, it could have been a whole lot worse. And yes I’m looking at you Mr. Schell.

Friday, August 22, 2014

Total Recall (1990)

Introduction:
For about a decade director Paul Verhoeven was a wild-man of Hollywood films. When Robocop literally exploded on the screens in 1987, it introduced his satirical, blood spattered, very R rated world. And viewers loved it (well until he did Showgirls, but that’s another story). Verhoeven tackled three sci-fi flicks in that run, and Total Recall was right in the middle. The question is, did Verhoeven overreach with this film, or did he hit that over-the-top sweet spot?

Summary:
Douglas Quaid (Arnold Schwarzenegger) is your typical construction worker with a sexy wife, Lori (Sharon Stone). Since Quaid lives in the future, he has a dream of traveling to colonies on Mars. No seriously, he has this dream all the time. He sees a commercial for a company called Rekall that can actually implant memories in your mind. So you can remember the great vacation to Mars you’ve never actually taken. Quaid heads over to Recall, and they convince him to try the deluxe package, where they implant a fantasy version of the vacation – where you are a spy on a dangerous secret mission: essentially a futuristic James Bond. Quaid loves the idea and goes for it.

Well, there is one little problem, as Quaid undergoes the procedure, his mind snaps. His brain is flooded with memories of being a real secret agent, with a real objective. He starts to backtrack and realizes that Quaid isn’t a real person, his real name is Hauser and he is on a mission that involves a dangerous rebel leader on Mars. Meanwhile a relentless hired gun named Richter (Michael Ironside) pursues him, and a man named Cohaagen (Ronny Cox) seems to be playing both sides of the table. Hauser also meets the girl of his dreams (literally) when he runs into the sexy Melina (Rachel Ticotin) on Mars. Can she help him make sense of all these memories, or is it going to take a case of Total Recall to find a solution to this puzzle.

Good Points:
  • Some wonderfully executed action scenes
  • A propulsive and exciting score by Jerry Goldsmith
  • A fun plot that twists, turns and doubles back on itself

Bad Points:
  • The satirical undercurrent may undermine the film for some viewers
  • Not the least bit accurate in its portrayal of Mars
  • If you don’t like Arnold, then you won’t like this movie

Overall:
Verhoeven takes Arnold and the viewers on quite a ride. The script always keeps you guessing with which direction it actually is heading. The violence is over the top but visceral. The sci-fi imagery is a lot of fun, and there is a lot of humor and satire in the film. It is really a well-balanced thrill ride that is still as entertaining now as it was when it came out.

Scores (out of 5)
Visuals: 5
Sound: 4
Acting: 4
Script: 4
Music: 5
Direction: 5
Entertainment: 5
Total:  4

In Depth Review
Doesn't matter if you call him Quaid or Hauser,
he's still Arnie all the way.
In recent years I’ve seen a bit of a backlash against Total Recall, with some viewers calling it cheesy, silly and just plain dumb. I’m not sure if these were people that were clamoring for a remake that we eventually got in 2012. But after that film landed with a bit of a thud, the backlash seemed to have calmed down a bit. But really my question to all those folks who declare this 1990 film “cheesy” is this: have you ever seen a Paul Verhoeven film before?

First and foremost this is a Verhoeven flick from beginning to end. Doesn’t matter if Arnold Schwarzenegger is in the film. Doesn’t matter if this is based on a story by Philip K. Dick. Doesn’t matter that you’ve got Jerry Goldsmith cranking out an awesome sci-fi score. Verhoeven was in charge and so the movie was going to have all his quirks, his satirical look at life and that crazy over-the-top ultra violence that was his hallmark. Either you can get on board with that or you’re gonna find the movie to be… well cheesy I guess.

I've got a headache this big, and it's got virtual reality
written all over it.
Total Recall has some excellent visuals going for it, especially when you consider the film was made in 1990. We hadn’t quite hit the full bore CG effect boom that would be ushered in by Jurassic Park, so most of the effects work you see in the film is practical stuff. The scenes are Mars are the visual highlights with some really cool miniatures and matte paintings adding scope to the film. The production design gives Mars a real lived in quality, especially in the slum areas Quaid ends up visiting. There is a feeling of oppression in the design and look of these areas. I especially like the use of red lighting, particularly in Cohagen’s office. Red is a key color in the film, showing up several times in various production elements (and not just in the gore being spattered about). You could take this as a visual cue that all the red is tied to fact that Quaid is not living these events but dreaming them.

Beyond the literal “red planet” motif, there is also some very interesting work for the alien technology that we see in the film. The size and geometric look of it reminds me of the giant beehive in Mysterious Island, in some ways. It is a sharp contrast to the human colony settings, and the ones used on earth.

The movie does take some extreme liberties with its portrayal of Mars. The way the atmosphere affects an unprotected human is all wrong. The red lighting and even the shade of red used by the production team is way off. However most of this can be explained away if you buy into the fact that Quaid is imaging all of this. He wouldn’t have a firm idea of what Mars is really like, except what he knows from movies.

Johnny Cab is a glimpse of our future - now I'm
really scared!
For the scenes on earth, Total Recall goes for a more near future look. Nothing is really too out of touch from our world. But there are neat little touches that tell us that we are in a world where technology advanced enough to give people some additional creature comforts. Every women I’ve known who’s seen this movie, comments on the receptionists nail color changing device. Johnny Cab (voiced by Robert Picardo of all people) is an immediately memorable character. In some ways it still has that 80s vision of the future, something that reminds me a bit of the classic Bubblegum Crisis series. It all adds to the film’s charm.

Sound effects are pretty solid in the film. Nothing super crazy in the design department. Since the film occurs in the near future, most of what we hear is familiar sound effects from our own time. But the explosions and gunshots pack a real punch, and what else can you ask for from an action movie with Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Total Recall represents some of the best action music from Jerry Goldsmith’s long career. The most interesting element is his use of electronic sounds to supplement the orchestra and provide a bit of a futuristic sound to the score. This is a favorite of mine from my favorite composer, so I wrote a whole blog about the music that you can read here. Suffice to say it supports the film wonderfully, and even has a couple of satirical moments of it’s own.

Exotic locals, dangerous locals and seductive women
yep, it's Bond in space!
At some point, the combination of Arnold Schwarzenegger and Paul Verhoeven had to happen. You had one of the biggest action stars of the 80s with a director who understood how to film a great over-the-top action scene. How could this not work? For me this is one of Arnold’s best performances. He does a good job with all the aspects of Quaid, from the construction worker who is almost content with his life to the man on the run from a shadowy organization out to kill him. He actually looks afraid in this film, something that we really hadn’t seen too much of in films like Commando or Terminator. This role allowed Arnold to be confused, afraid and even a bit helpless at times. The exact opposite of what a super spy is supposed to be. But I also love when he plays Hauser in the recordings. That guy is such a jerk, really a 180 from the Quaid character we know. You can tell Arnold is just have a good time in this film, and that kind of energy really helps carry the audience along for the ride, and matches the energy that Verhoeven injects into the film.

Matching his enthusiasm is Ronny Cox as Cohaagen. Between Robocop and Total Recall Cox was one of the best villains of the late 80s and early 90s. Not as smooth as say David Warner or Alan Rickman, Cox still had a sense of command about him. In this film he’s a bit of a blowhard, but he is still in control (or likes to think he is). He’s a great bad guy you love to hate. Matched with him is Michael Ironside as the hot-tempered Richter. Ironside has a real intensity in this role, almost going over the top, but remaining believable as a guy who just hates Quaid. The fires of jealousy burn strong, because Quaid was sleeping with his girl.

Sharon foreshadows her skills for "Basic Instinct".
And when that girl is Sharon Stone, well who can blame him. Stone as Lori really steams up the screen in nearly all her scenes. You almost get the feeling that she is actually more dangerous than Richter or Cohaagen. She has a couple great fight scenes including one with Melina. It’s a shame Lori makes her exit about halfway through the film, a little more of that bad girl wouldn’t have hurt.

Rachel Ticotin as Melina turns out to be Quaid’s dream girl. She plays the role just as the script describes her, a combination of demure and sexy. She is one tough girl, and shares in the action and danger of the second half of the film with Quaid. Ticotin gives the part a lot of personality and you genuinely like her.

The script to Total Recall was probably the initiator of the virtual reality film craze that eventually hit in the late 90s. While we can probably go back to Tron as the grandfather of these movies, Total Recall was one of the first mind bender flick made for a large audience. When the film came out it sparked lots of discussion and I knew several people who saw the film twice just to see if there were clues to the reality we were seeing in the film. Essentially it was the Inception of 1990.

Red: the color of blood, oppression and Mars.
What helped the film was the satire that kept the film from getting too serious. Sure there were plenty of Arnold one liners in the script, but there were also moments like the whole Johnny Cab sequence, or the bizarre fat woman costume that Arnold uses to sneak onto Mars. There is also a touch of social satire, not quite as obvious as the material in Robocop. But I like how a guy like Quaid, who has a really great life, can actually be so dissatisfied with it that he would risk a lobotomy. Depending on how you view the ending, he may end up brain dead.

Total Recall works as well as it does because of the way Verhoeven keeps the plot and action moving. Things do twist around, and the audience it kept guessing, but the ride is constantly fun. There is also a bizarre visual, intense action scene or funny one liner around the next corner. You can sit back and take in the explosions and blood. You can try to figure out if this is all a dream. Or you can realize that Total Recall is a solid piece of entertainment by a crew and cast at the top of their game. For me, it is the best of Verhoeven’s sci-fi trilogy (including Robocop and Starship Troopers), and certainly superior to Hollowman. Revisiting it, I was surprised how much fun the movie was, and how well it held up. 


In the end, we all got our asses to Mars.
Part of Hitchcock's World: Blogathon: Journey Across the Cosmos Through Film.

Tuesday, August 5, 2014

Tremors (1990)

Introduction:
Before Jurassic Park really unleashed the computer image revolution for creature features, there was a last hurrah for the practical effects in the monster movie genre. But the 1980s saw the rise and domination of the slasher film in the horror genre. You didn’t see many creature features any more. Then along came Tremors. It didn’t make a huge splash when it came out in theaters… but on VHS, it was a hit!

Summary:
Val (Kevin Bacon) and Earl (Fred Ward) are a couple of nice guy handymen who are just looking for excuse to get out of the small desert town of Perfection. The endless menial jobs, culminating in a sewage mishap, finally push them to hop in their truck and take off… just an hour too late.

Val and Earl discover several dead bodies on their way out of town. The circumstances are bizarre, with the corpses being mangled gruesomely. Is some kind of crazed killer on the loose? Before they can head to the nearest town for help, the road is blocked and all hell breaks loose. Geology student Rhonda (Finn Carter) is tracking some strange seismic activity, and it isn’t long before they all see the creatures tunneling under the ground, hungry for human flesh! Even though survivalists Burt (Michael Gross) and his wife Heather (Reba McEntire) have a huge amount of artillery, it may not be enough to stop the massive creatures creating the Tremors.

Good Points:
  • Impressive practical creature and gore effects
  • Lots of humor in the script and performances
  • Moves at a great pace, keeping you wondering just who is going to get devoured next

Bad Points:
  • Some of the special effects aren’t too convincing
  • Not much of a story other than, “We’ve got to get out of here!”
  • Those who don’t like kids in peril won’t like this film

Overall:
I remember loving this flick back in the day. My sister and I watched it a bunch of times. Its great to see it’s just as much fun as I remembered. The gross out effects are fun and squishy. The acting and dialogue is funny. The movie balances humor and horror almost perfectly. I also like seeing all the different plans they come up with to defeat the underground menace. If you’re a fan of monster movies and haven’t seen this one, check it out ASAP!

Scores (out of 5)
Visuals: 4
Sound: 3
Acting: 4
Script: 4
Music: 3
Direction: 4
Entertainment: 5
Total:  4

Curious about a full review, sent me an email and I’ll make additional thoughts to this review.


Obscurus Lupa reviewed the entire series of Tremors films (and the spin off television show). Check out her review here.

Monday, November 12, 2012

Troll 2 (1990)


Introduction:
Every few years a movie comes along that gets declared “The Worst Film of All Time!”. I always sigh and shake my head. Most of these aren’t truly bad. They are inept, inert or just kind of lame. But not the worst by any means (check out something like Starfighters or Monster A Go-go and you’ll know true pain). But sometimes you get a movie so amazingly inept and confounding that you’re left saying – oh bad movie, where have you been all my life! I had heard that this little flick was one of those.

Summary:
In a sequel (but not really) to the forgotten film Troll we follow the story of young Joshua (Michael Stephenson) and his family as they participate in a bizarre family exchange program. His family will live in a country house, while the country family of complete strangers will live in their suburban home.

While you’re still scratching your head over that one, we also learn that young Joshua is seeing dead people, or more specifically dead person, or even more specifically grandpa Seth (Robert Ormsby). Seems like the ghostly gramps is afraid that the family is in grave danger. Well because the movie’s title contains the word “troll” in it, we learn that goblins are out and about in the town and want to turn the family into plant based ooze and eat them. A few other dead-meat characters are introduced to they can be terrorized and it becomes a fight for survival that includes bologna, popcorn shooting out of a woman’s… um, I’m still not sure what happened in that scene, a guy turning into a tree, and some of the worst acting I’ve seen since Birdemic. Nothing can really prepare you for Troll 2.

Good Points:

  • Embraces the horror and doesn’t care who it offends
  • You’ll be able to say with confidence, “I’ve never seen that in a movie before”
  • Some of the gross out effects are pretty good
Bad Points:

  • The acting… oh sweet gods, the acting
  • Never has a clear idea of who this movie is supposed to play to
  • Hampered by a low budget (or enhanced depending on your view)
Overall:
This movie is bold in its ability to completely confound the viewer. One minute it seems like a silly kid based horror film. The next there’s a bunch of teenagers running around making out and getting killed, like a slasher film. There’s blood, there’s skin, there’s jump scares, and there’s people melting into green ooze and getting eaten up by little folks in horribly cheap costumes. The pace never flags as the movie just keeps tossing bizarre scenes at you. Such a clash of oddities makes it one of the most entertaining bad movies I’ve seen. While not as bizarrely awesome as House it is still heartily recommend for connoisseurs of the weirdly bad.


Scores (out of 5)
Visuals: 2
Sound: 2
Acting: 1
Script: 1
Music: 2
Direction: 1
Entertainment: 5
Total:  4

Trailer


Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Soultaker (1990) - MST3K Review


Summary:

Natalie (Vivian Schilling) just wanted to have some fun at Summerfest with her friends. But things go wrong after Zach (Gregg Thomsen) and his pal Brad (David Fralick) offer drive her home. On the way back, a mysterious man in black (Joe Estevez) steps into the road and causes the teens to crash. Amazingly they are unhurt, but now they start seeing the man in black (not Johnny Cash or the Dread Pirate Roberts) pursuing them. 

It becomes apparent that he is a dangerous killer with supernatural powers. One by one he hunts them down and takes collects their life essence. For Natalie there is no escape, because her destiny is entwined with the desire of a Soultaker.

Movie Review:
You know, Soultaker has a good story inside of it. You've got the angels of death wandering around taking souls. There is a hint of some kind of cosmic order, and an idea about reincarnation. There is a dark mystery to the title character, that hints at something deeper. The film could have been a lost gem, like Trancers.

It's just a shame that these kernels don't develop into a  successful movie. Vivian Schilling not only plays the lead but also dreamed up the story and wrote the script. She should have picked one roll over the other. The script needed another couple drafts by a writer with a clear idea of constructing a thrilling story.

But that leads to another question, what type of movie is this: straight horror or  supernatural thriller. If this was a horror film, then the Soultaker concept needed some streamlining. Something simple like the teens souls are jarred from their bodies and the Soultaker is coming for them. Now you have a prototype for Final Destination. If they were going for more of a supernatural thriller, more depth was required for the concept of the afterlife, the duties of the Soultaker, and the properties that a free soul possesses. Instead the script never has any fixed rules, and plays fast and loose to make things work. Because there are no rules, we don't feel any threat to any of the characters and any sense of danger is lost.

The acting is uneven. Schilling is pretty good as Natalie, keeping things fairly realistic for a character in that situation. Fralick provides a solid streak of sociopath for the drug dealing friend, Brad. Estevez is very good as the Soultaker. He is pretty menacing as he hunts down the wayward teens. But more impressive are later scenes where he adds a sense of lonliness to the character as he tries desperately to to convince Natalie to stay with him. Just like he did in his small part in Werewolf, Estevez takes the role and runs with it.

Our leading man, Thomsen is not very convincing. At the beginning of the film when he's hanging out with his friends and interacting with Natalie, he seems to be playing himself. But when he has to slip into serious protector mode, the effect is comical. Rounding out the cast is Robert Z'Dar as the lead Angel of Death. Z'Dar appeared in all kinds of straight to video horror, action and sci-fi flicks since the '80s and '90s. His features are perfect for an intimidating character. Unfortunately the film tries to make him mysterious by electronically altering his voice. Combined with his somber expression the effect is really goofy. Z'Dar made another appearance on MST3K in Future War.

Maybe the real deal breaker is the botched climax. The finale consists of the Soultaker chasing the remaining souls through a hospital. Because there are no clear rules for the souls or the Soultaker the audience has no clue what is on the line. What is the deal with the midnight deadline? How come souls have to open doors and can be affected by gravity? None of this is explored, we just get to watch our cast play hide and seek in a hospital. 

Still there is an ambitious film at the heart of Soultaker, and I kinda feel bad for coming down so hard on it. With a little more work on the script, this could have been a fun and memorable flick. Luckily there is plenty of great stuff for Mike the bots to delve into.

Episode Review:
Season Ten of Mystery Science Theater 3000 starts with a bang. They've got a solid sci-fi flick to mock and all kinds of special guests and antics in the host segments. I think the crew at Best Brains knew this would be the final season of the show and decided to do something a little special for this episode.

Things start off with a brand new opening credit song and title sequence. Now Castle Forrester is mentioned and you get some scenes of  Gorgo smashing up a building. This is a nice callback to the Comedy Central years that featured Joel and the bots watching a Godzilla film during the opening titles.

The host segments begin with Crow and Tom participating in a wet T-shirt contest. It's not what you think. Then the Satellite of Love begins to seriously malfunction. Mike and the bots ask Pearl for help, but she doesn't care and sends them the movie. At the next break a very annoyed Gypsy tells Mike that a mysterious ship is following them. Mike tries to take command but is less effectual than Captain Cameron from Star Trek: Generations. The next break starts with the Satellite hurtling out of control and our heroes in mortal peril. Unfortunately Pearl can't help because a Soultaker has appeared in the castle and is after Bobo's soul! Pearl takes matters into her hands and the Soultaker is revealed to be TV's Frank from the Comedy Central years! Frank and Pearl immediately hit it off and reminisce about old times (they were buddies in the Comedy Central years and delighted in mocking Dr. Forrester). Meanwhile, the mysterious ship saves Mike and the Bots.

In the next break the mysterious ship docs alongside them and it turns out that they are rescued by Joel Robinson (the original host of Mystery Science Theater 3000)! Joel and the bots reunite (with Joel even mentioning that Crow sounds kinda funny) and he tells them about his life after escaping from the Satellite. In the final segment Joel has fixed the Satellite and tells Mike and the bots that he can't take them back to earth. He feels that his years on the Satellite "made a man out of him" and that if Mike and bots stick it out, it might work for them too. Rejuvenated with that desire, Mike and the bots swear to carry on. Back on earth, Frank explains that he needs a soul. Bobo volunteers and then Frank and Bobo play a fun game of ring toss with Bobo's soul. Those guys!

As for the movie, Soultaker provides a ton of riffing fodder. The dated low budget special effects and silly looking props appear all over the place. Questionable acting combined with ludicrous  dialogue for some hilarious scenes. But mostly it's the late 80's vibe the whole movie has. Sure, it was released in 1990, but the whole look screams 1988. And as I've mentioned, cheesy '80s sci-fi make for some of my favorite episodes for Mystery Science Theater 3000.

In an odd twist of fate, this is one of those rare occurrences where the movie is almost interesting enough to distract from the riffing. The Soultaker concept is pretty neat and makes for some possible thrills. But in this case, it helps the show cook along at a good pace. The only real moment of slog occurs at the end when even Mike and bots are at loss with the endless hospital chase scenes.

It's a minor hiccup really, because there is so much to enjoy. The riffing tackles the oh so 80's Summerfest where Natalie and Brad meet cute. The visual effects of Soultaking provide plenty of comments. Mike and bots marvel at the oddity of Robert Z'Dar's face, wondering if he is storing nuts in his huge cheeks. They even provide extensive commentary when one character dares to imply that Led Zeppelin may be wrong. "What are you saying man? That Sabbath is wrong too?"

My favorite sequence of episode is when Natalie decides to take a shower. The bots get all excited the potential nudity. But then Crow gets something in his eye. He runs from the theater trying to find some eye wash. Meanwhile Mike and Tom tell him he's not missing anything at all - while the whole shower scene plays out. Poor Crow. The interplay between Crow and the guys is hilarious and Tom and Mike keep right on riffing the whole time. Great stuff.

In a way Soultaker is a great one for long time fans of the show. The special appearances by Joel and Frank always bring a smile to my face, and provide some good laughs too. Most dedicated fans rate this as a favorite based on the host segments alone. I find the riffing to be above average but not quite top notch.

I give this episode 4 soul rings out of 5.

This episode is available in the Mystery Science Theater Volume XIV.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

The Final Sacrifice (1990) – MST3K Review



Summary
Troy McGreggor (Christin Malcolm) is a little curious about his father. After digging around in his attic he finds evidence that his father was involved in some kind of strange treasure hunt. Before you can say “ski masks”, a bunch of cultists storm Troy’s home and chase him. But help is on the way in form of pudgy, down on his luck, but looking good in his mullet, action hero – Zap Rowsdower (Bruce J. Mitchell). Rowsdower takes Troy under his wing reluctantly, and Troy’s gonna need all the help he can get. You see, evil cult leader Satoris (Shane Marceau) has plans to make one of our heroes The Final Sacrifice.

Movie Review
Found out recently that this film was a student effort that somehow got a release on the direct to video market. I’m not surprised in the least. This movie has an extremely low budget and it shows. From its zero budget visual effects to the script with more holes in it than a screen door – every thing about The Final Sacrifice is bottom of the barrel.

OK, maybe that’s a bit harsh, but when you’ve got a chase scene involving a kid on his bike and a bunch of goons in a car – and the goons can’t catch the kid, well that means they couldn’t afford another car or the screenwriter/director Tjardus Greidanus had other things on his mind.

Maybe he was wondering if anyone was going to buy the name Zap Rowsdower.
The acting is about what you’d expect for a student film. Malcolm was a skinny nerdy looking kid playing a skinny nerdy looking kid. So he’s believable at least. Like almost everyone in the film, he overacts, but in a way it’s believable. I mean, he is being chased by cultists that could be Mexican wrestlers gone to seed.

Mitchell goes for the gusto as Rowsdower. He plays the burnt out reluctant hero well enough. Some of the action scenes don’t quite work out so well, since Mitchell isn’t in the best of shape. But he gives it a good try. Shane Marceau as Sartoris chews the scenery with the best villains in B movies. Some of his lines are certainly ridiculous, but Marceau goes for it. Usually with comic results, but at least he’s trying.

Last but not least is the scraggly craggily Ron Anderson as grouchy hermit Mike Pipper. The man sounds like Yosemite Sam and could have stepped right out of a western as the half crazed prospector. He injects the movie with some life, as well as the large chunk of exposition he is forced to give. I love it when an actor like this just throws caution to the wind and plays the part in cartoon character mode. It’s why I love bad movies.

What else is there to say? You’ve got bad sets for the ruins. Honestly they look like they were cobbled together out of cardboard, 2x4’s and clay. The action scenes range from hilariously under choreographed to badly filmed. The dialogue is groan worthy, and the plot needed a lot more tightening. The editing really hurts the film, especially with the endless scenes at the beginning of Troy going over his father’s papers in the attic. In a way I feel bad for picking on The Final Sacrifice, because it is only a student film. But at the same time – it’s just a bad movie.

MST3K Review
I was surprised to learn that this film was released in 1990, because it looks very 80’s. And as you know, I love a good cheesy 80’s flick. For me these often turn out to be some of the funniest films to watch with or without MST3K.

It’s mostly the characters that provide all the riffing fodder in this episode. Troy is such a skinny little guy that Mike and bots just go for him right off the bat. They add little grunts and sighs when he lifts napkins, opens doors and just walks in the woods. Poor Troy also seems to have a bit of a lisp and a high pitched voice – so that adds fuel to the fire, especially after he says “Rowsdower” in an especially breathy way during a camping scene.

Mike Pipper’s Yosemite Sam character is also a source for comedy, with his crazy voice, and crazier eyes he’s a gold mine. And his unique look even carries over into a host segment. Sartoris with his black trench coat, goth make-up and exceedingly deep voice is almost funny enough without riffing, but Mike and the bots love to put words in his mouth and it’s a good time.

But the true running joke in The Final Sacrifice is the character and name Rowsdower. The minute his name is mentioned Mike and Bots turn it into a running joke, turning all kinds of things into Rowsdower accessories, or just saying his name during an action scene (reminding me a lot of the same riffing technique used in the season five classic Mitchell). Some people find the whole “Rowsdower” running joke to be done to death, but I think they do it just enough to keep it funny.

The movie is Canadian and that just opens the door for all kinds of jokes at our Northern neighbors expense. Much like they did with the British earlier in this season and the Japanese in the previous season – some of the jokes get a little too mean. They’re funny, but they aren’t PC at all. I do notice that in the years on the Sci-fi Channel, this kind of humor increased quite a bit. I find I have to be in the mood for it, and I’ll enjoy it. But this time it seemed a bit too much, especially when it oozed into the host segments.

Speaking of which, the show starts off with a power outage on the Satellite Of Love and Crow and Tom try their hand at some looting. Then Pearl decides to take over the world, one human at a time. It doesn’t start out too promising. Tom Servo attempts to sing an Ode to Canada and things get real mean – real fast. Inspired by Zap’s mullet, everyone in the show comes down with “Hockey Hair” – even Brain Guy! Mike is immune to hockey hair, because he had it during the 80’s and when you’ve had it once you don’t get it again (that’s good news for me!). Instead he comes down with Grizzled Old Prospector’s hair. The show wraps up with Crow and Tom starting their own cult and Pearl nearly taking over her first person.

The first couple times I saw The Final Sacrifice I loved it. But watching it again this time, I felt that it takes a while to really get going. The scenes with Troy digging in the attic take a lot of time, and Mike and Bots really start running thin on riffs. It isn’t until Rowsdower makes his appearance that the energy comes back and the laughs are steady. As I mentioned the Canada bashing bothered me a bit this time too – so I can’t give the episode top marks. But it is a good one.

Four Zap Rowsdower’s out of five.

This episode is available on the Mystery Science Theater 3000 Volume XVII.

For those that are curious, I included the picture that does not show the Troy or Rowsdower featured in the film, and they changed the title to something a little more Indiana Jonesey. It was just too cool not to include.