Until Star Trek Into Darkness came out, this was the Star Trek movie most
reviled by fans. It was also the movie that signaled the end of Star Trek as a
viable film franchise. It came out the same year as Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers and Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets and Die Another Day. It pretty much failed to attract an audience in
that crowded year. Is the movie as bad as history suggests, or is this a sci-fi
gem that is dire need of rediscovery?
Summary:
Get your Sunday best ready,
because Will Riker (Jonathan Frakes) and Deanna Troi (Marina Sirtis) are
finally getting hitched. It is nonstop shenanigans as Captain Picard (Patrick
Stewart) delivers his best man toast, and Data (Brent Spiner) sings Blue Skies. Geordi (LeVar Burton) sees
what is inside one of the wedding gifts and cant figure out of Dr. Crusher
(Gates McFadden) is a big ol’ perv or knows something about Riker that he
doesn’t. As for Worf (Michael Dorn) he spends the whole reception staring down
Wesley (Wil Wheaton) over a slight that that occurred over a decade ago but a
Klingon never forgets.
What? That doesn’t sound
like a great finale to the adventures of The
Next Generation crew? Well how about a mysterious signal entices the Enterprise to stop by a world on the
edge of the Romulan neutral zone. There they find a prototype of Data named B4
(also Brent Spiner). He isn’t quite as advanced as Data. This causes him to act
like a five year old and make faces. Before (see what I did there) anyone can
smack B4 too many times, the Romulans want to meet with Picard in person. Turns
out their new leader, Shinzon (Tom Hardy) is eager to pursue peace. Picard is
wary because the Romulans are tricksy folk. But he is an optimist. Shinzon
turns out to be the leader of the Remans, a slave race that revolted against
the cruel Romulans. But Shinzon himself appears to be human and even more
disturbing – he is a young clone of Captain Picard. Before you know it
Shinzon’s master plan to destroy Picard and the Federation is unveiled. Can our
heroes defeat Shinzon and his massive new starship the Scimitar? And will one of our beloved heroes make the ultimate
sacrifice to save the Federation?
Good Points:
- Some of the best visual effects in the franchises history
- Works an interesting theme of duality into the story
- Patrick Stewart and Tom Hardy play off each other well
Bad Points:
- The script is a mess
- The movie can’t decide what it wants to be
- Lacks the overall impact it should have
Overall:
As far as series finales go Star Trek: Nemesis tries so hard to
deliver. On the surface a lot of things seem to work. The movie has great
production elements and the cast seems on board and does a good job. But the
script tries to do too many things at once and does none of them very well. It
delivers some good action set pieces and fine character moments. But anyone
looking for a fitting sendoff for these characters should stick with the
television series finale.
Scores
(out of 5)
Visuals: 4
Sound: 4
Acting: 4
Script: 2
Music: 4
Direction: 3
Entertainment: 3
Total: 3
In Depth Review
Oh pointy ship, oh pointy pointy. |
Quite frankly this film came
out around this time Star Trek was
feeling long in the tooth for a lot of folks. While some Trek fans were
completely engaged in The Next
Generation era of adventures, the general public still clung to the
original series and its cast as the definition of Star Trek. First Contact
was a success and got excellent critical marks, but it didn’t make as much of
an impact as Paramount wanted it too. Insurrection
fared worse, and many critics and fans calling it an expanded television
episode that relied too much on knowledge of the series to pull in new viewers.
The studio wanted Star Trek: Nemesis to avoid those
pitfalls. They wanted a big adventure movie that would pull in the viewers with
action and edginess. It was also intended as the final hurrah for The Next Generation cast. The film
would need to be some kind of celebration of these characters and all the
adventures viewers had shared with them. In addition to all that, Paramount
wanted a fresh perspective to the film. This worked well for them when they
pulled in Nicholas Meyer in for Star
Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. They turned to director Stuart Baird who had
never directed a science fiction film or Star
Trek episode before.
Captain Picard is raring for off roading excitement! |
It is tempting to call this
script impossible. But lets just call it a supreme challenge. Sadly it was one
that wasn’t conquered. The result is an unfocused script that harms a film with
so much potential.
Let’s focus on some of the
good points of Star Trek: Nemesis,
because no matter how much it is hated, the movie does have some good elements.
Visually, this is one of the best-looking Star
Trek films. The visual effects hold up really well today and they looked
spectacular when the film first came out. The starship battles are executed
with skill and bring a lot of tension to the film. The Scimitar is one wicked looking ship, and is one of the coolest
looking starships in the series.
Shinzon knows how to make an entrance. |
One oddity is the decision
to give this film a very dark look. Once the crew meets Shinzon most of the
movie is a palate of grey, black and shadows. Even the Enterprise interiors are
dimly lit. It is a stark contrast to the way the sets were lit in Insurrection and First Contact. It just feels like they were going for an obviously
edgy feel, instead of working interesting lighting in as part of the story.
That is something Star Trek: Generations
did extremely well, and why it is probably the most visually dynamic of The Next Generation films.
"No seriously, that hair cut doesn't suit you." |
The sound effects retain all
the traditional sounds of The Next
Generation television series, but given a bit more power behind them. Since
this movie features a lot of space battles, you get more weapon and explosion
sound effects. Most of the new sound material revolves around the Scimitar and its weapons. All in all it
is a solid mix of the familiar and new, just what you expect from a Star Trek sequel.
When it came to music, there
was really no one else to go to. Jerry Goldsmith had provided scores to The Motion Picture, The Final Frontier, First Contact and Insurrection. He composed the main title theme for Star Trek: Voyager as well. In many
ways Goldsmith was the musical sound of The
Next Generation (along with Dennis McCarthy and Jay Chattaway who provided
the bulk of the music for all the television series taking place in The Next Generation timeline). It was
only fitting that Goldsmith compose the score to Nemesis.
That outfit... just... wow. |
Beyond that Goldsmith
creates some exciting action music, using Shinzon’s theme, but also giving us a
heroic version of his Star Trek
theme from The Motion Picture. There
is also a four-note motif that he uses quite a bit for the camaraderie of the Enterprise crew that he established in The Final Frontier and used in all his Star Trek scores since. He also
reintroduces what some folks call the Federation motif that he used quite a bit
in The Motion Picture whenever the
crew was bustling around preparing for action.
This was one of the last
scores Jerry Goldsmith composed for films. He was already very ill at the time
of the composition. It was great to have him write music for one of the
franchises he was best known for, and give us all one more spin around his
musical galaxy.
"So, you seen Lore lately?" |
Mirror mirror? |
A couple of other new faces
appear in Nemesis. Ron Pearlman plays the creepy Viceroy that hangs around
Shinzon and looks sinister. Kind of a shame they don’t use Pearlman to better
advantage, but he does a good job glowering at everyone. Dina Meyer as the
Romulan commander Donatra gets a bit more meat to her role. She provides the Enterprise with some much needed
information and aid. There is even a fun cameo by Kate Mulgrew as Admiral
Janeway where she delivers some exposition, but it was nice to see her on the
big screen.
The rest of the cast gets to
have their moments to shine and all of them do a fine job. Frakes and Sirtis
probably get the most interesting moments in the film, but they also seem like
the most shoehorned into the plot – just to give them something to do.
Some of the best action in the franchise. |
But the rest of the cast has
some minor moments to work on. Dr. Crusher helps analyze Shinzon’s blood and
determine the medical issues the antagonist is facing. She helps Geordi with
B4. Speaking of Geordi, he is pretty much around to be Data’s friend so when
the big death scene happens he can look depressed. But Geordi and Data had
formed a bond in the show and that does get played into a bit here. Worf gets
to glower and say some ironic lines. But mostly he is around to shoot from the
back of a dune buggy.
Some of the goofiest action in the franchise. |
Then you have the whole
Viceroy/Troi/Riker thing. In an attempt to give Troi something to do, the
writers say that she can use her empathic abilities to find the Viceroy in the
cloaked ship? How is this possible? Because the Viceroy and Shinzon try to mind
rape her at one point in the film. Um… yeah. It is never explained why they
attempt to mind rape her. Shinzon thinks she’s hot? I don’t know. Anyway it
happens when Riker and Troi are getting steamy and it kind of kills the mood.
Riker doesn’t like anyone killing his mood. So when the Viceroy leads an attack
on the Enterprise Riker and the
Viceroy engage in a pretty uninvolving and extended fight scene. Yeah Riker was
always the man of action, but I’m sorry it just doesn’t work in Nemesis.
Now there's a Romulan! |
In the case of Nemesis I think they actually got the
antagonist correct. He does have a real reason for wanting to destroy Picard.
The mirror can’t keep seeing itself. There has to be a “real” person. For
Shinzon, Picard is the reflection that must be destroyed. Because of the
medical issue of his cloning, he must kill Picard to save his life. Those are
high stakes and they make perfect sense. But adding the destruction of the
Federation to the mix is pointless and clutters the story in a way that is
never delivered.
The sacrifice fails because
of how it is resolved. I was invested when Data makes his final move. It feels
right that he should attempt to save his friends and his father figure: Picard.
It completes his journey to become human. Likke his human companions, Data is
no longer immortal. He can die, and he chooses to die out of compassion – an
emotion that he has developed over the journey of the story.
So far, so good.
"Is that seriously the last episode of Enterprise? What the hell was that?" |
Even at a wedding you can keep Picard from speechifying. |
Sadly Star Trek: Nemesis falls apart. All the seams in the script become
painfully obvious. The manufactured feeling of the film further undermines the
final experience. Insurrection has
its flaws, but in many ways it feels like a better script more realized and
grounded in the world of The Next
Generation. Nemesis feels like a
franchise flailing for relevance. It didn’t need to flail. It needed to trust
its characters and the world it created to deliver an excellent, exciting and
relevant story. At its core Nemesis
has those kernels, but they never quite sprout. By the end of the film, you’ve
had an entertaining time with the crew, but it feels like a missed opportunity.
The fine crew on their last voyage. |
Good review, and I agree. Nemesis was pretty good, but missed the boat in some ways. You did a good job of trying to isolate why that was. I think once a movie's run time gets near two hours, it really has to be constructed well or it just gets messy as you said.
ReplyDeleteI don't think Nemesis was the worst of the Next Gen lot though, I think Insurrection might have been worse. For me, that movie was just a tad better than a regular episode on TV, and a film should be larger or more exciting than that.
That too might have added into the fact why Nemesis was sort of lackluster. Plus I think Trek around that time had pretty much over saturated the market with Voyager and Deep Space 9 (which for me diluted the franchise somewhat) so maybe fans, but more importantly non fans, didn't embrace the film. Still overall though it just wasn't that great a film either. I has its moments, but something was missing. It was interesting that you said it tried to mimic Wrath of Khan, which I never thought of, but you're right. I guess knowing that this was the last film of Next Gen, they felt compelled to have B4 come in at the end with a happy ending rather than a downer. That didn't bother me.
Yeah I've run into a few folks lately that like "Insurrection" less than "Nemesis". I guess opinions have softened a bit over time. I remember the fan reaction to "Nemesis" was pretty harsh at the time of its release. There was a general feeling that the creators just didn't get what fans wanted to see in a "Star Trek" movie. And that argument was made even stronger with the Abrams movies.
DeletePersonally I think "Generations" is the weakest of the TNG movies. I need to get a review of that one up. Man talk about messy scripts. "Generations" is the king.
Yeah I think "Star Trek" did get oversaturated in exposure in the 1990s. Having "Deep Space Nine" and "Voyager" on the air along with the TNG movies made a lot of folks (me included) take "Star Trek" for granted. I think one of the reasons the Abrams movies were so well received was because there was a large enough gap between "Enterprise" and the new film that people were hungry for it.
From where again did the pieces come of the android scattered around that desert as a trap? I’ve been to several deserts and never found one artificial lifeform, whether intact or in pieces. At least they didn’t rename him AF-TR at the end.
ReplyDeleteI agree that this movie seemed longer than it was – never a good sign. There is indeed the potential for good drama in facing oneself whether figuratively or – as in this case – literally. I might have gone with sacrificing Picard. Both of them.
They imply that Shinzon scattered them in that desert... but where did he get them. I don't think the script ever addresses it. I always wondered, because we knew of Data's other brother, Lore, from the series. Why didn't the writers use Lore instead of bringing up B4? But I think it was because they were focusing on new fans who wouldn't know about Lore, and would only serve to confuse them. Still the whole B4 angle just feels out of place, and only around to give Data the same mirror issue that Picard is facing.
DeleteOh wow, I can imagine the outcry of Picard getting killed at the end of this movie. Fans rioting in the streets! I honestly think that Paramount was hoping that "Nemesis" would be such a big hit that they could milk another movie or television series out of it. In that case they needed to keep Picard and Data as viable characters. In the end, it hurt the story.