Introduction:
So the 2009 version of Star Trek did something I didn’t think
was really possible. It got mainstream viewers back into the theaters to watch
a Star Trek film. Was it the magic
combo of J.J. Abrams and lens flares, or was there some techno-babble
validation that Spock could rattle off for us? In any case the success of the
film was enough to convince Paramount to get a sequel in the works. I for one
was looking forward to seeing where the crew trekked next. But was Into Darkness the destination I had in
mind?
Summary:
Captain Kirk (Chris Pine)
finds himself in a bit of trouble when he ignores the Prime Directive during a
mission, and exposes a pre-space faring culture to the sight of the Enterprise rising from the ocean. Kirk
faces disciplinary action, but not before the Federation’s base in London is
destroyed. Admiral Marcus (Peter Weller) believes that a terrorist named
Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch) was involved. After Starfleet headquarters are
attacked in San Francisco, Marcus sends Kirk and the Enterprise on a covert mission to attack Harrison who is hiding in
Klingon space.
Kirk is all for the mission,
but Spock (Zachary Quinto) and Scotty (Simon Pegg) are disturbed by it. Scotty
even resigns his post, and Dr. Carol Marcus (Alice Eve) picks up point on the
new photon torpedoes that the Admiral has given them. As the mission proceeds,
Kirk makes a fateful decision that will put him at odds with Marcus and face to
face with an enemy who will spell doom to a member of the crew. Zoe Saldana,
Karl Urban, John Cho, Anton Yelchin and Bruce Greenwood join in this Star Trek into Darkness.
Good Points:
- Amazing visuals and sound design in this film
- Excellent acting by just about everyone in the cast
- Has great pacing and tells a compelling story
Bad Points:
- Aims for a more dower atmosphere
- Some of the familiar plot beats are going to be too distracting for some viewers
- Those looking for less action than the 2009 film are going to be disappointed.
Overall:
This movie gets a bad rap,
but it is solidly entertaining and is actually a better made film than its
predecessor. Cumberbatch brings a lot of gravitas to his role and makes for an
excellent antagonist to our favorite crew. Meanwhile the plot delves into a
moral dilemma that is relevant in traditional Star Trek fashion. While I was hoping for a film
more about space exploration, what we got instead was a military thriller set in
the Star Trek universe. It works well
and is worth checking out, if you can get past some of the familiar surface
plot and character points.
Scores
(out of 5)
Visuals: 5
Sound: 5
Acting: 4
Script: 3
Music: 4
Direction: 4
Entertainment: 4
Total: 4
In Depth Review
You can't keep a good starship down. |
I mentioned in my review of Nemesis that I think Paramount is
really fixated on The Wrath of Khan,
and that they feel that film is the template that all other Star Trek films must follow. I remember
the writers saying early in preproduction for this film that they were going to
focus on space exploration and not include a central villain in the story. They
would instead have the conflict build from the unknown. That sounded great to
me!
Has the Enterprise met her shadow self? |
The thing is Abrams and his
writing crew took the story of Khan (and most importantly Space Seed the classic episode that introduced us to Khan) and used
it as a starting point. Instead of making this a tale of one man’s revenge
against Kirk, they turned it into a military thriller in which the crew of the
Enterprise finds themselves trapped
between a terrorist and a ruthless government. Into Darkness does what the 2009 film didn’t do: present us with
current social problem in the lens of science fiction adventure.
This becomes the major
stumbling block for a lot of people. If you can’t get past the concept of Into Darkness reimagining the story of
Khan and his conflict with the Federation, then you just aren’t going to enjoy
this movie. All the beats are there, with a few deviations. You know how the
film is going to end, and even be able to predict some of the dialogue.
"No, I'm not Loki, I'm Khan. Not even the same actor... are you even paying attention?" |
But leave aside those elements
and focus on the film as part of the new direction of the franchise. Does Into Darkness continue the growth of
the characters, the world of Star Trek
established in the 2009 timeline, and provide an action packed adventure. I
think it does. In fact, I hear people calling this one loud dumb movie, and I’m
not sure where they are coming from. Did they see the same film I did?
Admiral Marcus' model collection is the envy of the Federation. |
Abrams does stick to his
lens flares, so if those annoy you, well you aren’t going to get away from them
here. But I did find this film to be edited a little smoother, and actually
have a lot less shaky cam going on it. In fact most of the action scenes and
big special effects moments are top notch, another high point for the series.
The subdued colors are seen when the crew is not on the Enterprise. |
Much of the sound effect
work continues to be top notch. Once again Ben Burtt that mastermind behind the
amazing sound effects of Star Wars
returns to supervise the sound design. We get a mix of the old and new and it
works wonders in supporting the visuals of the film.
Michael Giacchino is back as
the composer. His work for the 2009 Star
Trek was really impressive. He continues his winning streak with Into Darkness. He brings back his bold
and heroic theme for the Enterprise
and Kirk. This time he uses many variations to keep things interesting. He also
brings back Spock’s theme a couple of times, but not quite as fleshed out as we
got in the 2009 film.
"What are you looking at, smooth head?" |
Khan does get a theme, one
that is calculating, building slowly to greater and greater intensity.
Giacchino uses it to great effect in the score, again playing it subtly when
Khan is at work. One of my favorite moments in the film and in the score is
when Kirk and Khan attempt to board the Vengence
by propelling themselves bodily through space. Giacchino plays Kirk’s theme in
counterpoint to Khan’s creating one hell of a musical ride that builds and
builds in excitement. Giacchino is one of my favorite film composers working
today and his work in the Star Trek franchise
is consistently great.
Scotty pleads his case to Kirk. |
Carol pleads her case to the Admiral. |
Khan doesn't plead to anyone. |
"The needs of the many... oh wait, wrong movie." Or is it? |
On its own, I think this
core concept is a great one. Unfortunately the writers are locked into the Wrath of Khan template. And so they are
forced to kill off a key cast member, because Wrath of Khan did it. Some people defend this as a way of
reinforcing the mirror concept of the two timelines, and Spock Prime’s key
scene suggests such a thing. That’s all well and good, but it doesn’t change
the fact that Kirk’s “death” in this film feels unearned and resolved way too
quickly.
Let the rage of a million Trek fans consume you! |
Sadly Into Darkness feels like it is just mimicking those films because
they were beloved. Kirk’s death feels flat because we haven’t been with Pine’s
performance over years and several adventures. And his return just seems too
convenient and pat. It isn’t a deal breaker for me, but it does harm the ending
the film when it wants to deliver its biggest punch, it falls flat.
One of the more creative and thrilling scenes in the whole franchise. |
"Wait, you're a guardian of the what?" |
"Wait, you're a Rider of what?" |
The Enterprise prepares for some Vulcanology. |
Enjoy this review? Click an
ad and support this blog.
I think Cumberbatch’s version of a calculating Khan is indeed a big issue with fans of Montalban’s marvelously over-the-top and passionate original – perhaps especially as portrayed in the original TV episode “Space Seed.” The TV episode actually had an interesting philosophical take on eugenics. In “The Wrath of Khan” Khan was out for simple revenge – and he seemingly missed that Ahab, whom he kept quoting, hunted the whale as an embodiment of a malevolent universe. That said, I like “The Wrath of Khan” anyway. I like it better than “Into Darkness.” But “Into Darkness” is OK. One has to allow new actors (and new screenwriters) to put their own spin on things. It is a good action flick and I don’t mind a cynical political view either. I agree that the inverted death scene doesn’t really have an emotional impact for reasons stated.
ReplyDeleteKeep having fun with captions
Yeah, it is hard to ignore Montalban's Khan when it has been around for so many years. But I think a lot of new fans connected with Cumberbatch's version of the character quite well. I certainly enjoy the movie, and give it a slightly higher rating because I like what it tried to do as a military thriller.
DeleteI do have fun with the captions... some may say I have too much fun.
Yeah, a friend and I was talking the other day about Star Trek, and he mentioned the newer reboots. I had to admit they are really some of the better Trek movies in a lot time particularly if you lean more to action and adventure. Even when you take all the TOS or Next Gen movies they are a better direction to go in, and for me as a Trek fan they're on the right track.
ReplyDeleteI know not everyone would agree with that, but again, hey it's the modern webby world. Not everyone is going to agree with anything these days. I didn't notice the lens flare (well I kinda did) that much in the first film, until it was pointed out on the web. But that doesn't diminish the film.
Yeah I never noticed the lens flare in the 2009 when we saw it in the theater. It wasn't until someone pointed it out to me in our first DVD viewing that I noticed it... and now I can't unsee it. But Abrams has a style and it works for him. I won't begrudge him his lens flares.
DeleteI will say that fun and adventure are the name of the game with this rebooted Star Trek universe and it works for me. I hope the television series can get back to a bit more of the social issues worked into the plot element that was so successful in TOS and TNG (and even DS9 which I'm enjoying right now).