Introduction
Roger Moore left the series
after A View To A Kill and as much
as some people loved him, it was time for a change. And what a change!
Timothy Dalton stepped in and made James Bond his own. He read the novels by Ian Fleming and
recreated the spy’s character. The result was a James Bond we have only seen a
few times before. Was the audience
of 1987 ready for the gritty and deadly world of espionage presented in The Living Daylights?
Summary
British secret service
agent, James Bond (Timothy Dalton) finds himself embroiled in a complex scheme
when he helps Russian General Koskov (Jeroen Krabbe) defect. Koskov enjoys freedom for a couple days
but is smuggled from England by the mysterious Necros (Andreas Wisniewski). Bond attempts to find out more about
Koskov and encounters Kara Milovy (Maryam d’Abo), cello player and Koskov’s
lover. Things get really
complicated when it seems that Koskov is not back in Russia at all, but is in
Moracco! And that’s just the
beginning of this dangerous adventure that will lead Bond from Vienna to
Afghanistan. Joe Don Baker and
John Rhys-Davies fill in key roles.
Good Points:
- Timothy Dalton nails the role in his first outing.
- Some of the best action scenes in any James Bond film
- John Barry provides his swan song score – and it’s a doozy.
Bad Points:
- The script is really uneven.
- The villains are less then threatening
- Wow, the opening theme… wow.
Overall:
When this movie is hitting
it’s high points, it provides some of the best of James Bond. Dalton is
excellent in the role. It’s a shame the script is such a mess. A plot that
flails around with villains who aren’t very menacing ends up robbing the film
of an effective punch. If the movies were feeling a bit stagnant, then this
film provides a nice balance of the new and the old. Well worth revisiting if
you haven’t seen it in a while.
Scores (out
of 5)
Visual– 5
Sound– 5
Acting – 4
Music – 4
Script – 2
Direction – 4
Entertainment – 4
Total: 4
In Depth Review
The 1980s started off with the
excellent with For Your Eyes Only. Roger Moore delivered what can be
argued as his best performance in a Bond film. But the films after that just
weren’t able to follow up well. Octopussy
is a mess of a film. Never Say Never
Again feels lackluster in many ways. A
View to a Kill is nearly as goofy as Moonraker.
Moore himself was feeling long in the tooth and decided to bow out for the next
film. The producers had to recast the lead, something they had been dreading
ever since the perceived disaster of OnHer Majesty’s Secret Service.
Looking at it now we could
have ended up with Pierce Brosnan in 1987. He could have carried on Roger
Moore’s legacy. The Living Daylights could have been a
different movie in tone and feel.
But the fates aligned against Pierce and instead Timothy Dalton stepped
up the part and grabbed it with both hands. I think it was needed.
We got hard-edged and visceral.
The ‘80s closed with James Bond as a spy with a license to kill, not to
quip. He was dangerous in every
sense of the word. It was the
first time the films were truly close to Ian Fleming’s creation as far as the
character of James Bond is concerned.
Visually this is one of the
more exciting James Bond films. A
concerted effort was made to bring the real life into the series. It takes us back to the look from For Your Eyes Only and avoids some of
the over the top elements of the two previous films. The sets by Peter Lamont
are well done, and inject the film with some solid visuals. These include the interior of the
Hercules, Kamran Shah’s headquarters, and the interiors of the English retreat
where Koskov is snatched up.
It is the stunning locations
that make the visual work stand out.
The movie opens in Gibraltar, providing a gorgeous backdrop to one of
the best pre-credit sequences of the series. Vienna gets shown off with lots of great scenes especially
the key scenes at Prater park. The city also doubles as Bratislava for the
scenes where Koskov escapes from the Eastern Block. Morocco was used to double as Afghanistan for the movies
third half and is very effective. Let’s not forget Tangiers where Bond
confronts General Pushkin, and the scheming Whitaker. Each location is used with a balance of the exotic and the
intriguing.
A return to reality requires
more realistic sound effects.
Typically in James Bond films the actions scenes get the most
attention. The sound work is
excellent in the pre-credit sequence, as well as the chase in the Austin
Martin, and the final battle between Bond and Necros. However quieter scenes offer plenty of atmosphere to the
film. The orchestra scenes in
Vienna work wonderfully. And the
scenes in Afghanistan balance the action and atmosphere very well.
The big story with the
acting was Timothy Dalton as James Bond.
I’ve already mentioned that Dalton’s take on the character was more
serious and intense than Moore’s.
He has been called humorless, wooden, and uninteresting. However, I think most of these are in
direct comparison to Roger and Pierce’s work in the part. Both Roger and Pierce chose to
underline the humor of the part.
In their own way, they created a Bond persona that was charming and
casual about his job. Dalton took it one step further. He was a killer, and one who didn’t
like killing. He wasn’t afraid of
his job. He understood it all too
well. However, he knew that no
amount of charm could hide the blood on his hands.
This was the James Bond of
the novels. He was a gentleman,
but he was a killer. He knew it
and the reader knew it. In Dalton’s
two films, the audience knows it too.
I think that made people uncomfortable. This is not a James Bond you could hang out with by the pool
and strike up a conversation with (Moore and Brosnan were more
accessible). This would be a man
you saw sitting in a bar with a vodka martini, intriguing, alluring, but
dangerous. Some have argued that
this is all well and good, but it’s not something the movie going public wanted
to see. I don’t agree. I think
Dalton does an excellent job. He’s
believable and honest in his portrayal.
We can read so much in his acting because he is doing more than
following the script. He’s
invested in the character. The big
difference between Dalton’s first film and the first films of Connery, Lazenby,
Moore and Brosnan is that Dalton was James Bond from the moment we see him in The Living Daylights.
Dalton’s new take can either
be seen as fresh and exciting or as a selfish attempt to change what was a
winning formula. I find the
“selfish” theory amusing. He would
not have been hired if the creators of the series had not wanted to take the
character in a new direction. The same thing happened in 2006 with Daniel Craig
in Casino Royale. The series needs to be refreshed or it
will grow stale (see the early 70’s films). Most James Bond fans can go back and watch Dalton’s films
and enjoy them. It’s only the
actor-centric fans that can’t let go.
Maryam d’Abo plays Kara
Milovy in the film. I’ve
encountered a real mixed reaction to her performance and the character. Some have called her a bimbo along the
lines of Goodnight from Man with the Golden Gun. Others have called
her strong and independent. Instead I think we have one of the most normal Bond women in
all of the movies. She’s an
average girl thrust into extraordinary circumstances. She’s not a CIA operative, or a diamond smuggler, or a
circus pilot. She just plays a
cello in an orchestra, and has fallen in love with a General. She’s not a bimbo. She’s just naïve and maybe a little
desperate. Any normal girl put
into her situation would probably react in a similar way. D’Abo plays the part with a mixture of
sweetness and naiveté that suits the character. She also plays the romance scenes with enough believability
that we can see her falling for Bond, even if she’s still faithful to Koskov. In
response we can understand Bond’s desire to protect her (even if her good looks
first catch his eye). In some
ways, this normal character can become lost among the more glamorous and
assertive Bond girls. I can’t fault the acting, d’Abo plays it perfectly.
We get a trio of villains in
this film. Let’s start with the
henchman, Necros first. The name
alone implies two things. He is
death and he sounds more at home in a less serious Bond film. But look beyond the name and you have
the best henchman of the 80’s.
Andreas Wisniewski was a dancer by trade and his stature, presence and
movement make him the perfect physical foil for Bond. We see him in action early in the film when he snatches
Koskov away from M16, and we understand just how deadly he is. He doesn’t say much but he doesn’t need
to. His motivations are a bit
murky, but really he’s just around to be the blunt instrument to get things
done. Wisniewski executes his part
perfectly.
Jeroen Krabbe makes an
interesting villain in Koskov.
He’s slick, he’s smarmy and he’s only out for himself. As the part is written, Krabbe plays it
to the hilt. He’s amusing in
several early scenes, especially when interacting with Bond. But once the plot begins twisting and
Koskov’s motives are revealed, he is still played for laughs. I’m not sure how much of this is due to
the written character, or the performance. Koskov is never threatening. He’s more of sleaze than anything else. It would have been infinitely more effective
if his slickness was an act, and he was a cold cruel person underneath. Then his fate to shipped home in a
diplomatic bag would have been more effective.
And then there’s Whitaker,
the egotistical American arms dealer played by Joe Don Baker. Baker’s got about one speed, but he’s
good at it. He’s a blowhard in this part, full of bluster and aggression, but
acting more like a big kid than a big threat. He’s more likable than Mitchell, but he’s not a terribly
interesting character. Baker got to do more in Goldeneye.
There is a large supporting
cast to help balance out the weakness of the villains. John Rhys-Davies is one of my favorite
character actors. He well cast as
General Pushkin. His first
appearances in the film imply menace (with no dialogue). Once the plot has twisted and we
realize he is on Bond’s side, he does a great job, even making a key appearance
at the end of the film. Art Malik
is also good as Kamran Shah, leader of the Afghan resistance. It’s a bit uncomfortable now to be
rooting for this likable leader.
In the back of your mind you wonder if this type of man would have
become one of the leaders of the Taliban.
As MI6’s man in Vienna, Thomas Wheatley injects the character of
Saunders with enough stodgy British-ness to play well off Dalton.
The London crew in The Living Daylights returns with a
minor twist. Robert Brown has
played M since Octopussy. He’s a bit dry and crusty, but he works
well as a grumpy foil to 007.
Desmond Llewelyn is still reliable as Q. It’s Caroline Bliss as Moneypenny that seems strange. I don’t know what it is about her
performance, but she is often forgotten when the London cast in mentioned, and
I can see why. I always forget
about her till she shows up in the Dalton films.
John Barry came back for his
final scoring job in a James Bond film.
For many people this is one of the best James Bond scores that Barry
ever did. It’s a great mixture of
brassy orchestrations, and the introduction of electronic sounds to a Bond
score. It’s the precursor to what
David Arnold ended up doing when he took over scoring duties in Tomorrow Never Dies. In addition to the score, Barry helped
write three pop songs for the film.
Ah Ha performs the theme song The
Living Daylights. Musically
it’s OK, but the lyrics are stupid and the singer’s voice just doesn’t work for
a Bond theme. Better suited are
The Pretenders with Where Has Everybody
Gone. This theme is used for
Necros and can be heard when he strangles his victims with his headphones. But my favorite pop piece is If There Was a Man, also performed by
The Pretenders. This tune is
played during the end credits, but it also appears (in orchestral form) during
the films more romantic scenes.
Barry combines all three themes really well and also manages to use the
classic 007 sound for the rest. The
balance achieved is really one of Barry’s best. Just be warned that the oh-so-‘80s drum machine is in full
force here.
While the movie does tend to get a bit plot-centric at times, that doesn't mean there is a lack of action. The pre-credit sequence is one of the best, with Bond attempting to stop an assassin from escaping from the cliffs of Gibraltar. The stunt work is impressive and Dalton is quite obviously involving himself as much as possible. The next big set piece is the car chase, with the classic gadget mobile versus an entire Soviet army. You get driving on road, on ice and into the snow with this one. The final set piece is where Bond faces down Necros on the airborne Hercules. Again, the stuntwork really shines, as both men end up hanging on a net as it flaps behind a real plane. A great scene, well filmed and executed.
The major weak point of the whole film is the script. So much potential is here, but I wonder if things ended up getting diluted in rewrites (especially since they ended up switching actors at least three times). The script spends so much time setting up and resolving the plot is that characters suffer. The villains are the ones that get it this time. Both Koskov and Whitaker are rough sketches and don’t ever present a threat to anyone in particular. Also suffering are characters like Pushkin and Saunders. A plot point that seems to be completely lost is the one involving Felix Leiter watching Whitaker. I always forget that Felix is even in this movie. Overall the script could have used some good streamlining and trimming of characters. Most people when they are asked about the plot of the movie don’t remember much of it.
The major weak point of the whole film is the script. So much potential is here, but I wonder if things ended up getting diluted in rewrites (especially since they ended up switching actors at least three times). The script spends so much time setting up and resolving the plot is that characters suffer. The villains are the ones that get it this time. Both Koskov and Whitaker are rough sketches and don’t ever present a threat to anyone in particular. Also suffering are characters like Pushkin and Saunders. A plot point that seems to be completely lost is the one involving Felix Leiter watching Whitaker. I always forget that Felix is even in this movie. Overall the script could have used some good streamlining and trimming of characters. Most people when they are asked about the plot of the movie don’t remember much of it.
On top of it is the fact
that some of the humor in the film feels very much targeted toward Moore or
Brosnan. Remember Brosnan was hot off of Remington
Steele at this point, and a
lot of that show focused on humor. Dalton’s lean mean style is completely at
odds with some of the really poor one-liners here. He has some really bad lines
during the excellent car chase. We wouldn’t get a script really written for
Dalton until Licence to Kill.
John Glen was a veteran of
the Bond franchise. He’d directed
the three final Moore films. The
best of these was For Your Eyes Only. In this film he goes back to that
mold. He directs the action with
plenty of excitement. The scenes
in Gibraltar, the car chase in the ice and the final battle aboard the Hercules
are excellent. He also manages to
bring tension to key scenes, especially where Bond confronts Pushkin. Things seem to get a little off track
during the battle at the Russian airbase, but for the most part he does a good
job with the film.
As I recall this didn't do particularly well at the box office -- for a Bond film, that is. I'm not sure why. Dalton presaged Craig's darker Bond and the violence is pretty gritty. Maybe audiences weren't quite yet ready for the shift to that from Moore's self-mocking humor. Or maybe it was something else. I also recall folks noting that this Bond cut back on the bedhopping. The freewheeling 70s (which, culturally slopped over into the early 80s) had come to a screeching halt a few years before this film thanks to the nasty STDs floating around; perhaps they didn't like being reminded of this.
ReplyDeleteI'm not the biggest of Bond fans, but I end up seeing the films eventually -- the movies are too much a part of the culture to miss, unless you do so intentionally -- and I liked this one more than most.
I believe this one did better in the UK and worldwide than in the US. I think the shift to the more serious Bond was a big issue. I remember word of mouth on this one was mediocre at best and some folks just saying that Dalton was bad. But I think it was more like, Dalton wasn't Moore. ;)
ReplyDeleteYes, the bed hopping was greatly reduced for just that reason. In this flick there are just two ladies, the one at the end of the pre-credit sequence and Kara. It seemed rather un-Bondian, but it was a conscious choice for just the reason you sited, AIDS. It just seemed in bad taste. But when Brosnan came into the role in "Goldeneye" the bed hopping came back.
But that is another connection between Dalton and Craig. Both of Craig's films have kept the girls down to two - just like Dalton. Never noticed that before. It will be interesting to see if the trend continues in "Skyfall".