By the time You Only Live Twice wrapped up filming,
Sean Connery was done. Making the films was proving to be grueling and the
intense spotlight of being James Bond was getting too bright. He wanted out and
the producers couldn’t convince him otherwise. A lot of people felt that the
series was done. For them Sean Connery was James Bone – period. But the
producers felt they had a viable franchise and formula. Bond could be played by
another actor, and they were going to prove to everyone that James Bond would
Return.
Summary:
James Bond (George Lazenby)
is still pursuing his nemesis Blofeld (Telly Savalas). But the trail has gone
cold and Bond is spending his time gambling on the French Rivera. It is there
he meets Tracy (Diana Rigg) the daughter of a powerful and wealthy
“businessman” named Draco (Gabriele Ferzetti). Draco may be the head of a crime
syndicate. Tracy and Bond connect in a way neither expects. When Draco learns
of this, he makes a deal with Bond. If Bond can get Tracy to fall in love with
him and calm her reckless and wild ways, then Draco will provide Bond with
information where Blofeld is hidden.
Bond’s desire to capture
Blofeld is stronger than his drive to enjoy a bachelor’s lifestyle, so he
agrees. He quickly finds himself caring about Tracy and really falling for her.
So it is actually with some regret that he obtains a lead from Draco. But Bond
figures this will be his toughest one yet, because Blofeld is hatching a deadly
scheme that will destroy the world’s food supply. If Bond can stop him, then
this is the last mission he will serve On
Her Majesty’s Secret Service. But fate is going to deal him quite a
different hand.
Good Points:
- Takes the best plot from the
Fleming novels and brings it to life
- One of the best scores of
the entire James Bond franchise
- Brings the thrills and
danger back to the franchise
Bad Points:
- The romance heavy first half
may be too slow for some viewers
- James Bond in love this
isn’t James Bond!
- Tries too hard to be
familiar and new at the same time
Overall:
This movie has its flaws,
but George Lazenby isn’t one of them. He is the main reason I see people write
this one off. However it’s got a great story that actually evolves James Bond
as a person. It puts him in some real danger (with the awesome stunt work to
show it off). Rigg and Savalas are excellent in their roles. The whole package
is top-notch material, and is easily one of the best 007 adventures of the
1960s.
Scores
(out of 5)
Visuals: 4
Sound: 4
Acting: 4
Script: 5
Music: 5
Direction: 5
Entertainment: 4
Total: 4
In Depth Review
|
Bond. James Bond. - 1969 |
No matter who followed Sean
Connery for On Her Majesty’s Secret
Service they were going to be unfairly compared and probably disliked. The
mentality that Connery was Bond was nearly a given. The producers were
fighting an uphill battle and I think they knew it. So they had to knock this
out of the park or else it was the end of 007. What is funny is that most
people think this movie bombed and was received poorly by critics. But the
movie actually did very well in theaters. No it didn’t reach the highs of Goldfinger or Thunderball, but to expect that isn’t realistic. Most critics
enjoyed the movie. This was not a half assed low budget cash in. You can see
the effort on the screen, something that can’t be said for the films that
followed, which can look pretty cheap in comparison (yeah Diamonds Are Forever I said it!).
|
An honest to goodness avalanche. |
When most people remember the
setting of this film, it is the snowy peaks of Switzerland that dominate the
final two thirds of the film. There is some amazing location shooting in this
movie, with impressive helicopter shots. I also have to mention the footage
taken on skis. OHMSS features the first James Bond ski chase, and actually
gives you two for the price of one. Some of this footage is just plain crazy.
When you see all the various camera techniques used to film these action scenes
it is amazing. The stunts are top notch and no other Bond film has come close
to this much excellent ski action (but ForYour Eyes Only comes really damn close). To top it off, the avalanche you
see in the film was actually real. You read that right, no models in those
shots. There is also a completely insane car chase scene that puts Bond and
Tracy in the middle of a stock car race.
Portugal gives us some
additional location footage, mostly for the scene around Draco’s home and
during the Riviera sequences. Draco’s birthday scene is most impressive with a full-fledged
bullfight captured on screen. But the location is used again for the wedding at
the finale of the film, and the mountain top road leading away from it.
|
Bond meets the Angels of Death. |
In addition to the location
work, the production design for On Her
Majesty’s Secret Service is handled well. The movie is going for a more
realistic look and Adam’s futurist style would not have fit. Many of the sets
have the opulent looks that you expect in a Bond film, but lack that extra
touch of fantasy of the previous three films.
Like nearly all the James
Bond films of the 60s and 70s, there is some rear projection work in this movie
that is less than convincing. It can be distracting and I’ll admit that does
affect the final face off of the film a bit. The final sequence occurs on a
bobsled run with Bond and Blofeld attempting to kill each other at high speed.
The stunt work is jaw dropping, but the rear projection inserts look silly.
It’s a shame too, because it robs this final battle of the punch it should
have.
|
Who knew? James Bond invented the slip and slide. |
One more key element to the
visuals is the unique editing used in the film. Of all the James Bond films up
until Skyfall this movie is the most
visually interesting when it comes to camera angles, fight scene editing and
overall execution. Director Peter Hunt started out as an editor, and his
influence on the final visual product is distinctive. It really gives the film
it’s own rhythm and feeling. This is a long film, clocking in at 142 minutes,
but Hunt’s visual style and editing panache help the whole movie just fly by.
|
Piz Gloria is one of the most spectacular locations
in the franchise. |
Most of the sound effects
work in the Bond films is impressive. On
Her Majesty’s Secret Service doesn’t disappoint in that regard. But what is
interesting is that Hunt decided to shake things up a couple times during the
film and used sound in interesting ways. During a fistfight in a tight corridor
where Bond attempts to escape some of Draco’s goons, the punches and sounds of
the bodies hitting the walls is run through an echoplex. The result is one of the most surreal fistfights
in a 007 adventure. On top of that, you have what director Peter Hunt wanted to
go down as the noisiest fistfight in action film history. Bond beats up one of
Bloefeld’s minions in a shack filled with bells. The men throw each other
around and create one hell of a ruckus. It’s an unusual battle to say the
least.
|
The soft glow of John Barry's score adds to
the romance of the movie. |
Composer John Barry returned
for his fifth consecutive James Bond adventure. Many film score fans feel that
his score to On Her Majesty’s Secret
Service is the best film score he ever wrote for a James Bond film. In
addition to a thrilling main theme for the action, he also composed a beautiful
love theme called We Have All the Time in
the World, sung by Louis Armstrong. I wrote a whole blog about the music
and how it works in the films, you can check that out here. Suffice to say,
this is easily one of the best scores to any of the 007 films, and is a great
place to start your James Bond music collection.
|
Lazenby was a gamble. |
Let’s hit the heart of the
argument here. George Lazenby is the make or break for a lot of people. I find
that it is the Connery fans that seem to dislike Lazenby the most, maybe
feeling that Connery got robbed of one of the better 007 scripts in the
franchise. In some ways I can sympathize, but at the same time, I think Connery
was burnt out on Bond. You can see it in her performance in You Only Live Twice and you can really
see it in his work on Diamond Are
Forever. I’d rather have a new actor trying his best over an established
actor barely going through the motions.
|
The outfit that inspired Austin Powers! |
That said, Lazenby doesn’t
quite seem to have the part down. He works fine in the action scenes and does a
decent job with the ladies in Bloefeld’s hideout. But his acting during the
relationship building scenes with Tracy doesn’t quite work. He also seems a bit
overmatched by Savalas. Now to be entirely fair, Lazenby has a large portion of
his dialogue over-dubbed when he is under cover. That adds up to about half an
hour where we don’t have him actually speaking. On top of that, someone,
somewhere decided that more quips and witticisms were needed in the film. So
Lazenby ends up with a bunch of one-liners, obviously dubbed after the fact and
often when he isn’t even on the screen. This may add to the feeling that
Lazenby was a bit too cheesy in the role.
|
007 spends some quality time with his favorite
magazine. |
I see an actor who had an
immense pressure put on him. He really is trying his best, but his experience
prior to this huge film was working in commercials. In a lot of ways, he had to
really step up his game and do it really fast. Knowing all this, I think
Lazenby did a fine job. Yes, it could have been better. But I also think that
if he had tackled Diamonds are Forever
that movie would have given us an improved actor along with a more involved
actor. The result could have been a better film. As it stands On Her Majesty’s Secret Service is the
only Bond film in Lazenby’s resume. For various reasons (depending on who you
talk to, they shift) Lazenby was not invited back for the next film. But I feel
that his onscreen performance was not the reason for it.
|
Diana Rigg doubts the veracity of your claim. |
Besides, no matter what you
think of Lazenby’s performance, it is hard to find fault with Diana Rigg as
Tracy. If you read the novel, you may feel that Rigg was miscast. But I think
she actually changes the dynamic in a way that works well. She seems a better
match for Bond, as confident as him at times. And Rigg certainly shows that
Tracy can handle herself well. The tremendous car chase scene actually has
Tracy in the driver’s seat the whole time. She also does battle with one of
Blofeld’s larger henchman. This confidence is certainly appealing, but it the
fragility that Rigg brings to the character that attracts Bond. We get glimpses
of it throughout the film. It’s a really great performance, certainly making
Tracy my favorite Bond girl of the 1960s films.
|
He's given up the sucker for a cigarette and a
diabolical plan. |
When it comes to Blofeld,
most James Bond fans feel that Donald Pleasance was the perfect version in You Only Live Twice. And for a more
comic book version of Bond, which that film certainly is, he works great. But On Her Majesty’s Secret Service is a
much more serious film. Blofeld needed to be less cartoonish, and Savalas
strikes the perfect balance. He is urbane, cold and ominous. Of all the actors
playing Bloefeld he feels the most like he could be a physical match for Bond
(which is closer to the novel version of the character). Savalas also has a
ruthless charm about him that I like. He really carries the part off well, and
it’s a shame we didn’t get to see him return for the next film.
|
007 undercover as an upperclass twit. |
The supporting cast is also
very good. We have the usual London crew with Bernard Lee as M and Louis
Maxwell as Moneypenny getting some good time interacting with Bond.
Moneypenny’s reaction to the wedding at the end is pretty funny. Desmond
Llewlyn doesn’t get much screen time as Q in this movie. In general the gadgets
are downplayed. Gabriele Ferzetti plays Draco as a smooth and confident
operator. In an odd turn of events, it appears he’s been completely re-dubbed,
so his performance is a bit tricky to judge. Ilse Steppat as Blofeld’s
dangerous and determined partner in crime does a good job looking threatening
and yet competent with her job. Finally there is the bevy of beauties that are the
“Angels of Death”. All are quite lovely, but Angela Scoular steals the show as
Ruby, the English gal who throws herself at Bond. But sharp-eyed viewers will
also see Joanna Lumley in the group.
|
This film contains some of the best ski stunts
in the franchise. |
On Her Majesty’s Secret Service is one of the few James Bond movies of the 1960s that
actually attempts to develop James Bond as a character. This comes right out of
Fleming’s novel, probably one of his best of the series. The script follows the
novel very closely, allowing Bond (and us) to meet and fall in love with Tracy,
and then get pulled into the Blofeld’s dark plan. The final result works great
in the novel, but the movie ends up feeling a bit uneven at times. The first
half is pretty much all set up, with the romance taking up a lot of the screen
time. It is necessary, and it keeps the relationship from feeling arbitrary or
forced. At the same time it contrasts wildly with the action packed final third
of the film. This is something that comes right from the source material, so I
can’t fault them too much. But I wonder if a better balance could have been
found, to give this film a flow that works better. The 2006 version Casino Royale had a similar design, but
executed it much better.
|
Tracy doubts the veracity of Blofeld's claim. |
There is also a strange script
element that I’m really surprised no one caught. In the novels, James Bond does
not come face to face with Blofeld during Thunderball.
His first meeting is during On Her
Majesty’s Secret Service. The men meet for the final time in You Only Live Twice. Since the films
switched order a bit, Bond and Blofeld meet in You Only Live Twice for the first time. But in the film version of On Her Majesty’s Secret Service a key
plot point revolves on the fact that Blofeld doesn’t know what Bond looks like.
This makes sense in the original order of the novels, but not in the movie
version. This has lead to jokes that Blofeld didn’t recognize Bond because
Lazenby was playing the part.
|
Bobsledding insanity! |
The script gave Peter Hunt a
great base to make one of the best James Bond films. Aside from the pacing
issue, there is very little to dislike about how he executed the film. Some of
the moments meant to reassure fans that this was still the James Bond they knew
and loved don’t play too well today. They are painfully obvious, and are pretty
much filler. You have the scene where Bond goes through his desk and remembers
moments from all his previous adventures (prompted by props and helpful music
cues from the other films). You have a janitor whistling the theme from Goldfinger. You even have characters
saying things like “Same old 007.” It is distracting and a bit silly.
|
Tracy drives like a mad woman! |
There was also the decision
to have Lazenby attempt to look, and act as much like Connery as possible. This
was something that none of the following actors had to deal with. Each one got
to put his stamp on 007. But Lazenby was basically filling Connery’s shoes and
they wanted him to do just that. This was a decision made at the production
level, and I can’t blame Lazenby for it. But instead of reassuring people, it
invited a direct comparison. This was a stupendous backfire for the production.
If Hunt had been a bit more seasoned, he may have had the clout to push back on
this idea.
|
Bond faces his perfect match. |
But as a first time
director, Hunt brought energy, creativity and excitement back to the series.
The best elements of the final third of the film are the action and thrilling
suspense scenes. Hunt uses all the tricks in the book to keep ratcheting things
up. James Bond really feels like he is in peril in this film, with Blofeld’s
relentless pursuit pushing Bond to more and more desperate acts. The escape
from Piz Gloria is really one of the best thriller sequences of the entire film
series.
|
Bond did return, but poor Lazenby didn't. |
On Her Majesty’s Secret Service ends up being a James Bond film that is unique in
many ways from the rest of the franchise. It breaks many of the conventions of
the series that had been established. Other times it stays firmly locked to
them. It has a dynamic look and feel that no other Bond film ever managed until
Skyfall. It is a story that focuses
on James Bond, and gives the character some real gravitas. The final scene of
the film gives Bond a defining character moment. One that Roger Moore, Timothy
Dalton and Pierce Brosnan all got to use in at least one film. Within that
block of the first 20 Bond films it is a milestone not just for the story, but
also for the entire production. For all those reasons On Her Majesty’s Secret Service deserves to be revisted and
reevaluated. The great thing is, I see the movie constantly near the top of
“Best of Bond” lists frequently. It is nice to see that it is being judged on
it’s own merits, instead of what fans back in 1969 wanted it to be.
My favorite film of the franchise as I mentioned last comment, and yet... I'm actually glad Connery didn't do this one (though I am basically a Connery fan) because the way he played Bond didn't really suit the romantic plot line. They could have done worse than Lazenby. But I can help thinking they could have done better: not a slam on his acting but just a sense he didn't quite fit the part. Peter O'Toole wouldn't have fit either, and he was a fine contemporary actor. When watching it I sometimes think how different it would be another actor in the part -- say, Richard Harris, Michael Caine, or Patrick McGoohan. Nonetheless, it's still a favorite, and if I ever met Lazenby at some convention I'd want his autograph.
ReplyDelete"can't help thinking"
DeleteYeah, I think Lazenby could have grown into the part a bit. Starting with something as complicated as OHMSS was probably a mistake. It does require some heavy lifting on the actors part.
DeleteYou make some great alternate Bond selections there. McGoohan in particular would have been interesting. I think the producers were hoping to catch lightning in a bottle twice. Connery had been acting before "Dr. No" but he was not well known at all. I think they wanted Lazenby to be the same kind of phenomena. Didn't quite work out that way for him.
I should re-watch this one due to Diana Rigg alone. I've seen parts of it, but admit my movie shame that I haven't seen it from beginning to end. Your recent Bond postings have made me want to go back and watch some of the older franchise, so you review well. Funny when I see some of these scenes like the shot of Telly Savalas how I'm reminded of Austin Power. :) Just can't help it.
ReplyDeleteYeah I think Mr. Meyers watched this film quite a bit for his "Austin Powers" flicks. I know he was riffing the spy genre of the 60s in general, but a lot of his visual touches really seem to be inspired by this film and "You Only Live Twice".
DeleteThis one is well worth revisiting. Check it out if you get a chance.