Showing posts with label 1936. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1936. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Tarzan Escapes (1936)


Introduction:

Things take a turn for the stupid in Tarzan Escapes. If only I could escape from watching this one. This movie has a serious case of sequel-itis. This occurs when the creators take the same basic story from an earlier film and recycle it with a few small changes.

Summary:

Rita (Benita Hume) and Eric (William Henry) arrive in Africa to find their cousin Jane and take her back to civilization. They join forces with a cad named Captain Fry (John Buckler) who leads them on the quest.

Fry has an ulterior motive of course, he wants to capture Tarzan and use him as some kind of attractions in London. It's all very vague, and of course Fry completely underestimates our hero.

Once Jane meets up with her cousins she decides to go back with them to help clear up an inheritance issue. She explains it to Tarzan in what is actually the best scene in the movie. Then heads off. Then Fry springs his trap, or tries to. But it all goes horribly wrong. The final chase involves men being torn apart by trees, a stampede of elephants, a journey into dark caves and carnivorous iguanas dressed up to look like… um something really odd.

Good Points:

  • The tree house is pretty cool
  • Jane and Tarzan share some great scenes together
  • The iguana monsters are hilarious

Bad Points:

  • The story is a stale rehash
  • Goes overboard with the reuse of stock footage
  • The comic relief is painful

Overall:

If you choose to ignore one Tarzan movie, pick this one. Aside from a few nice moments between Jane and Tarzan this movie is dull and lifeless.

Scores (out of 5)

Visuals: 2

Sound: 3

Acting: 3

Script: 1

Music: n/a

Direction: 2

Entertainment: 2

Total: 2


In Depth Review

The huge, huge problem with Tarzan Escapes is that it is so familiar. The cousins take the place of Harry from the Tarzan and his Mate. But these two are not likable at all, and come across as a couple of pompous gits. You don't care if lions do eat them. Fry takes the character of Martin from previous movie and makes him more devious and mustache twirling. But all his plotting and conniving doesn’t do anything to add any tension to the paper-thin plot. When he gets taken out of the iguana monsters in the finale, you are too busy laughing at his silly demise to cheer.

Then there's Rawlins (Herbert Mundin) this movie's Jar Jar Binks. He's a cockney idiot that does prat falls, makes stupid observations and faints at the drop of a hat. He's supposed to be endearing but I spent the whole movie wishing for Tarzan to break his spine. Luckily he does get killed, and that helps the movie immensely.

Also contributing to the familiar feel of the film is the reuse of footage from the earlier movies. It almost feels like the script was written around the footage, and probably typed out in a couple days to boot. All the big set pieces you've seen before. What is bizarre is how they try to cram footage from Tarzan the Ape Man, which was using a very different camera (one closer to what you see in silent films). It and the very theatrical makeup on Tarzan stand out so much it's comical.

I know back when these films were released, years had passed, and unless the theater near you was rerunning them, you weren’t apt to remember too clearly how much of this movie was made up of older films. But watching them in close proximity it becomes painfully obvious that only 40% of the film is new.

But there are a few bright spots. O'Sullivan and Weissmuller have some very good scenes together; especially as Jane struggles to tell Tarzan she is leaving. These two understand the characters and we see that spark that made their relationship in the first two films so appealing.

But by this time the Hays Code as in full force, and all the steamy interplay between Jane and Tarzan was toned way down. Just look at the outfit Jane is wearing in this compared to the one form Tarzan and His Mate. The actors are still able to convey a youthful romance that carries their scenes, and MGM was probably thankful to have such solid leads at the heart of the film.

I also enjoyed the silly tree house that they lived in. Swiss Family Robinson eat your heart out. This has a working elevator powered by an elephant, running water, powered by Tarzan, and a ceiling fan powered by Cheetah. Yeah it looks like Ewok Village 2000, but it is a fun concept.

As for the action and adventure, so much of it is old footage there isn’t much to get excited about. The big set piece now revolves around Tarzan captured in a steel cage and thrown off a cliff. The movie then spends nearly ten minutes showing us Cheetah running around (and shrieking naturally) gathering animal friends to help. Then the elephants come and with plenty of shouting, shrieking and grunting, Tarzan finally in the most painfully slow way possible escapes. Whatever momentum the film may have had at that point is pretty much killed.

To come down so hard after the epic jungle adventure of Tarzan and his Mate was a real disappointment. Of the eight Tarzan adventures I viewed this was by far the worst. So I recommend that you leave this one trapped in the steel cage and hope it never escapes again.

Read about the other lessons I learned from Tarzan the Ape Man at my review of the first collection of the films over at DVD Verdict.

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Murder with Pictures (1936)

Introduction

We’ve got another flick from the 100 Mystery Classics. This time it’s a comedy/mystery from the 30’s. Will the laughs counter the suspense or will we be thrilled too much to laugh? Wanna take a guess why you’ve never heard of this movie?

Summary

While suspected crime boss Nate Girard (Onslow Stevens) is throwing a victory party after narrowly escaping some jail time, his lawyer is killed. No gun is found, but everyone at the party is a suspect. This includes Meg “Nutmeg” Archer (Gail Patrick), who is connected to Girard somehow. Also suspected, even though he wasn’t there, is the fast-talking fast thinking photographer Kent Murdock (Lew Ayres). Due to some crazy high jinks a photo of the killer exists, but it keeps jumping hands from Murdock to Nutmeg to McGoogin (Paul Kelly) a reporter with a score to settle with Murdock. Will the plucky reporter and the mysterious woman solve the “Murder with Pictures”.

Good Points

  • The movie moves fairly quickly.
  • Some of the plot twists are clever
  • Gail Patrick is really good as Nutmeg

Bad Points

  • Lew Ayres brand of comedy doesn’t click
  • The basic premise is pretty contrived
  • Makes you wish you were watching “The Thin Man” instead

Overall

Mixing comedy with mystery has been a staple of movies since they’ve been created, but it can still be tricky to pull one off. Part of the problem here is that the style of humor is very dated – so you’ll either go with it for find it unfunny. Ayers just doesn’t click for me in this part, and since the whole movie focuses on him it never takes off. Gail Patrick is pretty good and she helps the movie quite a bit, but in the end, this movie just never provides thrills or laughs.

Scores (out of 5)

Visual: 3

Sound: 3

Music: N/A

Acting: 2

Script: 2

Direction: 2

Entertainment: 2

Total: 2

In depth

Witty banter is a hallmark of the fast talking reporter solves a crime genre. You need a good team of writers and actors to pull it off. If you want to see a classic in the genre, check out “His Girl Friday”. Sadly “Murder with Pictures” just can’t measure up to that fun film.

From the basic technical angles, there’s nothing to really complain about (other than the poor print and sound quality of the version I saw). The film is adequately filmed, not really using noir or any style per se. The sound is in the same boat, capturing the dialogue and the necessary gunshots. Typical of a 30’s movie there is no musical score, just opening and ending title fanfares.

The mystery script is convoluted but has potential. A hapless photographer catches the murderer in action and then loses the plate with the photo on it. The plate changes hands several times during the movie, and eventually ends up revealing the killer: the surly mysterious gent with the mustache. So there is pretty much no suspense because just looking at the guy, you know he’s the killer. But some of the plot twists along the way are clever, and kept me guessing just how the killer would be revealed.

The comedy script is where things go really wrong. Honestly they really tried to keep things snappy, witty and fun. But the lines are dumb or nonsensical half the time. Combined with Lew Ayers performance and it just doesn’t work. I was strongly reminded of Jack Lemmon the entire time Ayers was on screen, but Lemmon can do witty banter. It just made it more obvious how important delivery can be for comic lines.

The other performances are solid. Gail Patrick is the best of the bunch playing Nutmeg as determined, a bit desperate and willing to do anything to get her man. In another movie she could have been great, a girl you can never really trust. Kelly is solid as the foil for Murdock, cocky and just annoying enough for you to root against him, but never treading the line into generating hatred. Stevens plays Girard with a touch of Bogart. It’s not bad.

I wish director Charles Barton had worked a little closer with the cast to punch things up a bit. He edits the movie quickly enough and he keeps the story moving. But the failure of the humor also falls in his lap. A good director knows when the scenes aren’t working, and works to make them better. He didn’t and I ended up pretty bored for the 69 minutes the film was on.

Check out what James Lileks though of the movie here.