|
Wizard with lightning attack. This is "Lord of the Star Hobbits" right? |
It has come up before and it
is sure to come up again. Which genre do I pick when I categorize my blogs
about Star Wars. They are science
fiction, right? You see space ships, robots, laser guns and technology we don’t
have yet. But then you’ve got The Force, which is clearly some kind of magical
power. Also people are fighting with swords and most of the conflict is on a
grand high fantasy level. So are they fantasy films? No, because you have WAR
in the title. Much of the conflict in the series revolves around armies
clashing for different ideals. These are war films. But then you have the Ewoks
and Jar Jar Binks and BB-8. Those are all such juvenile characters appealing to
a very young crowd. These are kid flicks.
George, George, George, you
didn’t make it easy for us.
|
"Obi Watanabe? Are you nuts?" |
But that was by design.
Lucas was making something that crossed multiple genres. It had elements of
various familiar movies and stories. By mixing them together you get something
that is new and yet familiar at the same time. Star Wars has been around so long, it is hard to remember when it
was fresh. In 1977 people hadn’t seen anything really like it, and yet it
reminded them of the old Buck Rogers
and Flash Gordon serials. There were
elements of the John Carter novels in there. Obi-Wan was very much like a
samurai from a Kurosawa film (and Lucas reportedly wanted famed Japanese actor
Toshiro Mifune for the role). Darth Vader was a black knight of Arthurian
legend and Princess Leia the damsel in distress (with the 70s twist of her
being a lot tougher than she appeared). And then you have the music with John
Williams creating a Golden Age flashback with his full orchestral bombast.
During this time it was rare to hear scores that weren’t jazzy or rock
influenced, fully electronic or comprised of mostly songs.
As the series expanded over
the decades, each film added to different genre elements. Empire Strikes Back expanded the war storyline, as well as building
on the powers of the Jedi and giving us more sci-fi goodies to watch. Return of the Jedi brought out even
more silly aliens for the kids, a climactic resolution to the war and hero
storylines and even more robots and strange new worlds. You get the idea.
|
Hiring a gunslinger at the local bar? Where's Luke's white ten gallon hat? |
The Star Wars franchise embraced its identity as a cross genre work
that doesn’t’ fit snugly into any one role, but manages to do all of them with
a solid degree of ability. Its success with the public and the impact on pop
culture inspired others to give the same approach a try. Why do a straight up
Western when you can do a Space Western like Outland or Firefly. How
about set up a noir detective story in a grimy future like Blade Runner. Or maybe a soap opera inserted into a uncanny horror
film. Welcome to Twin Peaks. And
don’t get me started on anime. It seems like they’ve been doing this for as
long as Lucas (and maybe even before). You want romance, and knights and giant
robots all mixed into one story, Vision
of Escaflowne may be what you’re looking for.
These days it seems like
standard genre films just don’t cut the mustard any more. In most cases they’ve
been done so many times there aren’t any new stories to tell. Sure you can
shake up how you tell them, and with a director with a strong vision can make
something fresh and exciting like Tarantino did with Django Unchained. But most films opt for combining a couple of
genres together to add another unfamiliar element to the whole thing. I think
we can thank (or curse if it annoys you) Star
Wars for making that more acceptable.
|
Where will her journey take her? |
To me, Star Wars is a fantasy saga clothed in science fiction trappings.
The core of the stories (especially the first six) is the rise and fall of a
hero. It is classic mythic storytelling. Anakin represents the tragic part of
the cycle in the first three films. Luke Skywalker represents the heroic part
of the cycle in the second set of three. We’ll see if Rey matches one of these
two cycles or if she forges her own path.
The characters and their
evolution is what Star Wars is all
about. It tells stories that are based on very old tales and links them
together to create a new set of mythology. I’m not saying that’s a bad thing,
but to me it is an important thing.
In my mind, science fiction
is about humanity in a general sense. It always asks questions at its core, and
these are questions about all of us. How will we survive on other worlds: The Martian. Is technology our gateway
or hindrance to the next stage of evolution: 2001: A Space Odyssey or Ghostin the Shell or The Matrix. What
are the perils of controlling evolution and life: Jurassic Park or Star Trek
II and III.
Star Wars
comes close to asking some of these questions. In the original trilogy you
could argue that there is an anti-technology message. The Empire has all this
impressive technology at their disposal, but they never win completely. They
are constantly thwarted by rebels who have less resources, and outdated
technology. Luke destroys the first Death Star without any technological aid,
just The Force as his guide. Yoda is a Jedi Master who lives in the middle of
nowhere with not a single sign of any technology, and yet he is one of the most
powerful characters in the saga. The Ewoks literally use sticks and stones to
bring down the Empires best legion of troopers.
But the films never really
ask the question, are humans better off without technology. Because all the
characters are surrounded by technology at all times, and would be at a loss
without it. Even though R2-D2 is unable to help Luke destroy the Death Star,
they would have been dead earlier in the film if R2-D2 didn’t save them in the
trash compactor.
|
"No seriously kid, no Jedi says Whoopee!" |
So is the message a confused
mess? I don’t think so. I think Lucas is not telling us that technology is evil
or saying that humans are better off without technology. It is not a question
of technology at all, but a question of instinct. Ben Kenobi (and later Qui Gon
Jinn in The Phantom Menace) ask
their pupils to focus zen-like on now. “Stretch out with your feelings.” “Feel,
don’t think. Use your instincts.” “Your eyes can deceive you, don’t trust
them.” The message here is that technology is a fine too, but it is only a
tool. The human instrument is just as critical. This message is about the
person, not the scope of humanity.
The other time Star Wars comes close to commenting on
technology is with the clones. But again, it becomes a question of use. How you
use the clones is more important than any moral or ethical questions on their
creation. I think science fiction stories dealing with clones almost always
struggle with that moral dilemma. But Star
Wars doesn’t even question it. It just happens. In many ways they are
treated like droids are in the Star Wars
saga. It is an interesting approach (and one of the things I really liked aboutthe prequels). But they are in service to the story, not an element meant for
us to ask questions about.
|
Good vs. Evil in visual metaphor. |
All this means that Star Wars sits firmly in the realm of
fantasy for me. I find it easier to view it through that lens, especially from
a thematic and narrative point of view. Star
Trek is much more of a science fiction series, even though it often focuses
on the characters stories and lives, and will dive into war and fantasy
elements. In the end Star Trek
offers us questions about humanity’s journey. Star Wars offers us questions about our personal and spiritual
journey.
No, you want a series that
is a true amalgam of science fiction and fantasy in almost equal parts – The Matrix has you covered there.
Enjoy this content? Click an
ad and support this blog.
As you say, there is much slop-over among scifi and other genres. Though there is hard scifi that tries to violate no physical laws, most scifi typically (and famously) asks the reader/viewer to accept one impossible – or at least improbable – premise such as FTL drive or the secret existence of transdimensional reptilian overlords. Star Wars asks for enough such premises to fill a Death Star. So, I suppose it’s fair to regard it primarily as fantasy. Mr. Campbell would be satisfied with the mythos.
ReplyDeleteMythic elements are at the core of any good story in any genre including history, of course. Myth is how we transmit values on a societal level and form our own values at a personal level. (Anyone who sees Star Wars as a sad tale of a father shamelessly betrayed by ungrateful children probably should be avoided as a business partner.)
I think that the mythic elements of the story are what made such a big impact on me when I was young. I think that story telling is still very strong in the prequel, even if the surrounding elements are less successful.
DeleteAh man, seeing the original trilogy as a betrayal is pretty funny. Reminds me of "How I Met Your Mother" and how Barney saw the film "The Karate Kid" and assumed it was a tragic fall of Johnny and Daniel and Mr. Miyagi were the villains.