Introduction:
When most folks hear the
name Martin Scorsese, you imagine gritty, gangster, realistic flicks with a hard-hitting
edge. A delightful family film never enters your mind. But in 2011 Scorsese
attempted just that, and in the bargain attempted it all using 3D. Was the
result worth checking out?
Summary:
Welcome to Paris in the
1930s, where a young boy named Hugo lives in the walls of the Paris train
station and tends the many mechanical clocks, to ensure they are always
accurate. However, Hugo has a secret, no one knows that he is the one
performing these tasks, and must remain hidden or else he’ll be caught by the
Station Inspector (Sacha Baron Cohen) and sent to the orphanage. Unfortunately,
Hugo must steal to survive, and that puts him in direct danger every day. One
day, he is caught by the cantankerous Georges (Ben Kingsley), a toy maker who
seems intrigued and annoyed by the little thief.
Further mystery unfolds when
Hugo meets the pretty niece of Georges, Isabelle (Chloe Grace Moretz). To solve
the mystery, the two much delve into Georges past as a silent filmmaker, reactivate
a mechanical man and witness a trip to the moon. Prepare yourself for some
laughs, some adventure, an intriguing mystery and a love of movies as you take
a trip with Hugo.
Good Points:
- Amazing use of visuals
- Solid acting by the entire cast
- Wears a love of movies on its sleeve
Bad Points:
- Some of the humor with the Station Inspector doesn’t click
- Relies on some knowledge and appreciation of silent film
- Those looking for typical gritty Scorsese will be disappointed
Overall:
For any fan of film, this is
an easy movie to enjoy. Scorcese’s enthusiasm for the visuals comes right
through. So does his love of movies, with all kinds of references (obvious and
subtle) to silent film. But the heart of the story, about Hugo and his father is
really what makes the whole thing click. This is an easy recommendation to
anyone looking for a fun and visually absorbing family oriented film. And it
was a wonderful musical score by Howard Shore.
Scores
(out of 5)
Visuals: 5
Sound: 4
Acting: 4
Script: 4
Music: 4
Direction: 5
Entertainment: 4
Total: 4
This is a marvelous, captivating, and beautifully filmed movie, especially suited for those with some interest in the early years of film. Yet, though I usually enjoy seeing films I rate so highly a second (or third or fourth) time, I have no particular urge to see this one again. I can't really explain that, but there it is. I do recommend it to anyone once, though.
ReplyDeleteI can kind of see that actually. I'm in no rush to rewatch it, but I can see revisiting it somewhere down the line. I am annoyed that I missed this in the theater in 3D. I can imagine that the visuals were really impressive.
Delete