Introduction:
As the millennium came to a
close James Bond was about to engage in one last hurrah. While fans enjoyed the
action packed adventures of Tomorrow Never Dies, most folks wanted something a little more serious this time
around. Will the final result be something that may be the best of the Pierce
Brosnan era, or will it turn out to be disappointment that is better forgotten.
Summary:
After a bomb blows up the
powerful Sir Robert King (David Clader) in the middle of MI6 headquarters, M
(Judi Dench) has had enough. She suspects that infamous terrorist Renard
(Robert Carlyle) is behind the bombing. The vicious man had targeted the King
family previously, kidnapping the lovely young Elektra (Sophie Marceau) several
years earlier. M sends her best agent; James Bond (Pierce Brosnan) to protect
Electra and find out what Renard is planning next. The game is just beginning
and Bond finds out he is only one of the many pieces on the board. John Cleese,
Robbie Coltrane, and Denise Richards all have a part to play in a game where The World is Not Enough.
Good Points:
- With an interesting script to work with Brosnan gives his best performance as Bond
- The pre-credit sequence is one of the best of the entire franchise
- David Arnold provides one of his best musical scores for the series
Bad Points:
- A script that can’t decide what type of movie it wants to be
- Big action scenes feel shoehorned into the film
- Denise Richards is a nuclear scientist… uh, right.
Overall:
This is a movie at war with
itself. On the one hand it wants to be an intelligent thriller that examines
James Bond’s character and provides him with some real challenges. The other
side wants this to be popcorn fun with huge explosions, Richard’s jiggling
chest and lots of bad puns. The film ends up collapsing into a mess, almost
working on minute and leaving you bored the next.
Scores
(out of 5)
Visuals: 5
Sound: 4
Acting: 3
Script: 3
Music: 5
Direction: 3
Entertainment: 2
Total: 3
In Depth Review
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03c61/03c612c9616ad48e5de9a17aff0fdef5cca2e49a" alt=""
First off, the visual
elements are top notch. Most Bond films have a ton of money on the screen and
this is no exception. The set design and execution is excellent with some
realistic location shooting in Turkey, Spain, France and England to ground the
action. Visual effects are kept in a more realistic vein for this film, relying
on excellent stunt work and in camera effects. Sure there are some computer
generated effects, but most of this is grounded in reality (as opposed to the
over the top antics of the next film, Die Another Day).
The other element that is
always top notch is the sound effect work. There’s plenty of good stuff for
action fans here, immersive explosions, gunfire ricocheting around and even
huge saws cutting all around you. One of the best sequences is the finale where
the sinking submarine surrounds the viewer with water dripping, running and
gushing all around.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6750b/6750bf70059d26b663c59aab58444b0bd4967dc1" alt=""
I’ve always liked Brosnan as
Bond, and here he gets perhaps his juiciest script. He does well with it, as
Bond is put through the ringer. Elektra’s vulnerability and fragility appeal to
him. He becomes a protector, beyond what M had asked of him. But as the game
begins to unfold, Bond has to make hard decisions and confronting M with the
truth. His final scene with Marceau is excellent, adding gravity to the role
and the scene (even if it appears that some key script elements seem to be
missing).
Marceau is equally good as
Electra. Her relationship with Bond and Renard are the main forces that move
the plot and themes along. It’s a difficult role, one that demands she be
alluring, mysterious, dangerous and emotionally unstable. She keeps the
character believable and has some great chemistry with Brosnan turning her into
one of the best female leads in a Bond film.
Robert Carlyle does his best
with an underwritten role. The character of Renard should have made The World is Not Enough into a classic.
He’s got the scarred face, the immunity to any form of pain, and the will power
to do just about anything to achieve his ends. The twist revealed near the end
of the film puts his character into a new and disturbing light. And yet the filmmakers
and script never give Carlyle enough to work with. I wonder how much of his
performance was left on the cutting room floor, and how much was just never
fleshed out in the script. The result is a weak villain given a good
performance by an excellent actor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edc52/edc52989ba3ab1d097d084743c5c8fd25b164ea1" alt=""
Ok, I’ve put it off long
enough, but I’ve got to write about Denise Richards eventually. Look, I have no
problem with her being a Bond girl, honestly. She’s got the right look, she’d
done a few well-known movies at the point, and she looks great in a wet shirt.
Cast appropriately she could have been fine. Unfortunately someone, somewhere
decided that she’d be a good fit for the nuclear scientist who helps Bond with
the explosive threats in the film. She was giving the ridiculous name Dr.
Christmas Jones and given dialogue that she can’t say convincingly to save her
life. It’s a laughable performance that sinks the movie for a lot of people.
Now, I’m very much aware of Tanya Roberts equally horrid performance in A View to a Kill. The big different
here is that The World is Not Enough
has some very serious themes in it, as well as a tone that is more dark and
gritty than the more airy and fun Bond flicks. This character just doesn’t seem
like a fit for this movie and Richard’s casting just makes it worse. Sadly,
whenever people remember this film, the first thing they say – oh the one with
Denise Richards, she was horrible. It’s even become one of the big jokes when
talking about bad casting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4da68/4da681e941ae89bef9ac151ef8c3f1d644c9b01d" alt=""
The name of the film comes
from the Bond family motto, first revealed in On Her Majesty’s Secret Service. There are quite a few connections
to the 1969 film, including one of the few mentions of James Bond’s wife. The
character of Elektra is very similar to Tracy from the older film, and with
that in mind we can understand Bond’s attraction to her. The darkness in her
character has potential to bring out the darkness in Bond – and their final
confrontation is proof of that. Then there is Renard the man who can feel
nothing, and yet feels something for Elektra. He and Bond share a coldness
within, and one that makes them more similar then they’d like to believe.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2e92/b2e9229dad24273ee125b99bbfe6727eebfa165c" alt=""
The script also seems to
have been horribly mutated by too many cooks. The dark edge of the main
relationships is completely scuttled by a horribly confusing and ultimately
uninteresting master plan. The villains goal is to destroy all the oil pipelines
in Europe and Asia except for the ones owned by the King family. This is
explained, but poorly. The script spends so much time attempting to force in
intrigue and twists. It should have focused on the twists of the relationships
between Bond Renard and Elektra. In the end, ask most folks what the main villain
was after in this movie and you’ll get a blank look (even if they can even keep
it straight while watching the film).
This feels like a real case
of the creators getting cold feet. It is well known that Brosnan wanted to
bring more of an edge to Bond’s character, to give him a little more to work
with. There were hints of this in Goldeneye,
but most of this was lost in the action packed insanity of Tomorrow Never Dies. I think the screenwriters came up with this
great story to delve into the dark side of Bond, and when the rest of the creative
team read it they were afraid. Where were the car chases? Where were the
gadgets? Where is the big-breasted beauty to bed at the end of the film? Where
was the levity? So a several rewrites later and you’ve got this mess of a
script, with some of the worst one liners ever uttered by James Bond. The final
line of the film is as groan inducing as anything Roger Moore was forced to
say.
And yet I can’t completely condemn this movie. All the acting (with the
exception of Richards) is very good. Marceau steams up the screen. Llewelyn
gets his last bow and David Arnold knocks the music out of the park. Finally I
have to talk about the wonderful boat chase that opens the film. It’s filled
with excitement, thrills, a few laughs and leads into the wonderful opening
credits. Cucinotta is deadly and smoking hot (and you wonder how in the world
they let her die at the end of the scene and not figure out a way to keep her
in the rest of the movie). It’s 15 minutes of the best James Bond action you’ll
probably ever see. It’s enough for me to give it an average rating. What kills
me is that I can see a really great movie in here, something that could have
ended the 1990s with a bang and been something of a showpiece for the Brosnan
era.