"Don't blame me for 'Red Sonja'!" |
What happens when you
combine Star Wars and Dungeons and Dragons? You get Conan the Barbarian of course. Ok, so
that was kind of a trick question, but there is a method to my madness.
I like to think of the early
80s as the Barbarian Age of Fantasy. Within the years of 1982 and 1985 or so,
we got a ton of fantasy films that featured muscular tunic-less guys wielding
swords, fighting wizards, saving the (usually topless) girl from some evil
creature (who may or may not be a puppet). Some of these films were backed by
big budgets and major studios. Others
were made outside of Hollywood for a pittance and forged a name for themselves
in the burgeoning world of direct to VHS releases. I’ll readily admit that I
have a nostalgic place in my heart for these fun and often silly films. But I
always wondered what caused this sudden explosion of fantasy films that hit
hard and then faded away by the time 1989 rolled around.
The 70s were rough, even for Sinbad. |
Like many things that
occurred around this time in film history, I think it all starts with the
astounding popularity of Star Wars
in 1977. Prior to that film science fiction was seen as a low profit genre for
major studios. There were some hits over the years, but they were few and far
between. 20th Century Fox was hoping Star
Wars would bring in a quarter of what Planet of the Apes made for them in merchandising and spin offs. But I don’t think
they were holding their collective breath. Instead the film exploded in
popularity, and a whole new group of filmgoers were exposed as a new target
audience. Make a film packed with fun adventure, exotic visuals and a
rollicking sense of fun and you had something.
D&D: 80s style! |
Fantasy was always around in
some form in filmmaking. But by the time the 1970s rolled around, audiences
were demanding gritty and less glitzy. Fantasy films reminded them old
Hollywood. It’s not hard to see why, when you watch the films like The Seventh Voyage of Sinbad or all the
sword and sandal films from the 1960s. They feel a bit stagey even if there is
plenty of fun to be had with them. Not that the 70s were devoid of fantasy
films. You still had movies like TheGolden Voyage of Sinbad, The Land
Time Forgot and a handful of others. But they never brought in the money
like other films did.
The other element that may
have played a part in this was rise in popularity (infamy in some cases) of Dungeons and Dragons. The tabletop role playing
game had been around for a while, but more and more folks were picking it up.
Who could resist dungeon delving with your friends and slaying goblins by the
dozen with fireballs? This same crowd was part of the group that made Star Wars the huge success it was. A
fantasy film of the same caliber could also be a moneymaker.
Hawk's party is ready for dungeon delving. |
One of the first of these
new waves of fantasy films actually feels like a Dungeons and Dragons adventure brought to life. It is called Hawk the Slayer (1980) and hits all the
requirements. You have a band of adventurers including a Hobbit sized thief, a
towering giant, and an elf who can shoot rapid-fire arrows. Our hero, Hawk
swings a sword with skill, and leads his band into a castle to face a deadly
overlord played by Jack Palance. The movie is played pretty straight, but ends
up being amusing because of the over the top acting, low budget special effects
and wobbly sets. All in all it is one of my favorite fantasy films of the era,
and I’m very sad I didn’t discover it until the 2000s. I’m not the only one who
missed out on this flick, because it didn’t’ do well enough to deliver on a
much hinted at sequel.
There was a breakdown in communication. |
Right behind it was a bigger
budget and much more impressive film, even if it did feel like a throwback to
the 1950s style of filmmaking: Clash of
the Titans (1981). Ray Harryhausen’s swansong features his amazing blend of
stop motion animation and other visual effects that compete for screen time
with Harry Hamlin’s hair and Laurence Olivier as Zeus. The movie is sluggish at
times, but hits all the fantasy/mythological sweet spots. That Medusa scene
manages a wonderful blend of suspense with the lighting, the effects and spine
tingling music making it all work. As a kid, this movie was one of my absolute
favorites, and I watched it over and over again. I wasn’t the only one, because
I’ve seen quite a few writers, directors and artists talk about this movie
being their gateway drug to all things Harryhausen and Greek mythology. That
said, the film did Ok in its theatrical run, but not enough to convince other
studios to jump on the bandwagon.
It wasn’t until the one-two
punch of 1982 that we saw fantasy really take off. We got The Beastmaster and Conan
the Barbarian in the same year. Both films were more entrenched in the
sword and sorcery feel of pulp fiction by masters likes Robert E Howard and
Fritz Leiber. The two films featured physically strong characters seeking out
revenge against tyrants who slaughtered their families. Both include magic,
monsters and scantily clad women aplenty. Both films avoided the stodgy feeling
of the earlier Hollywood fantasy style and went for a healthy dose of blood and
nudity. The two films shared many stylistic similarities, and were successful
in different ways.
"Ok, which one of you stole her fur bikini?" |
The Beastmaster did moderately well in theaters, but really boomed in on home video and
cable reruns. It has quite a bit of humor woven into the story and while it can
get violent the film never gets too dark. It didn’t have the budget for stop
motion effects, so it used animal actors and creative costume and makeup to
delve into the magical aspects of the story. I think there were just as many
fans of Tanya Robert’s bathing scene as there were for the cute ferret
companions in the film. The Beastmaster
stays fun all the way through, but also keeps a pretty solid tone of adventure.
He just had to wear the helmet for tribe picture day. |
Where Conan the Barbarian exceeds is in the way it makes the world feel
real. The film has a darker, more serious tone, and the violence is brutal at
times. It captures the untamed savagery of the original stories, even if it
isn’t based on any one of them. Director Milius keeps the dialogue to a
minimum, focusing on visual storytelling and avoiding some of the poor acting
that would infuse later fantasy films. Let’s not forget the wonderfully primal
and powerful score by composer Basil Poledouris. Conan the Barbarian would be much less effective without tracks
like Anvil of Crom and Riders of Doom. This film was a big
success in theaters and on home video and cable. It was this film that brought
about a boom in fantasy films in the early 1980s.
"If I don't make eye contact, maybe he'll go away." |
Both films did eventually
have sequels and spin offs. The
Beastmaster didn’t see its sequels till the 1990s, well after the fantasy
boom had ended. But there were enough fans to make The Beastmaster 2: Through the Portal of Time a success on home
video and get the sequel The Eye of
Braxus five years later. Conan the
Destroyer managed to arrive only two years after its original film, but
suffered in a major shift in tone. Going for more of a mix between Hawk the Slayer and The Beastmaster, you end up with a film
that ups the humor and tones down the brutality and sensuality of the previous
film. It wasn’t received well, and plans for the third film were scuttled in
favor of the spin off Red Sonja a
year later. Sadly that film was even worse. This is one of those films that so
much potential but a weak script, a jumbled tone and bizarre performances just
keep the whole thing from coming together. It’s not even that riffable.
I couldn't make this up if I tried. |
But many of the films that
flooded the market afterwards are very riffable indeed. It seemed like every
few months a new muscular hero exploded onto screens to fight monsters and save
half naked women. Some films like Ator
the Fighting Eagle (1982) featuring Miles O’Keefe were lower budget
retellings of Conan the Barbarian.
Others went to other sources, like Corman’s The Warrior and the Sorceress (1984) which is based on Akira
Kuroasawa’s Yojimbo, but with evil
puppets and a four breasted witch. Sometime we got women warriors swinging
swords like Hundra (1983) or Barbarian Queen (1985). In fact Corman's production company made quite a few of these films. Most popular were the Deathstalker movies, which started out as blatant Conan retells, but turned into more lighthearted films, with Deathstalker and the Warriors from Hell even making it to MST3K. Speaking of the riffing puppet show, they also tackled Outlaw a sequel to the movie Gor which was based on a sword and planet series written by John Norman.Other times we
got a film that managed to balance everything just about right, even on a low
budget. The Sword and the Sorcerer (1982)
is a lot of fun, and manages to keep things moving and amusing for most of the
running time. There were oddities like the ultra-dark Dragonslayer in 1981, where baby dragons devour a helpless
princess. Then there were the odd fusions of robots, and lasers with fantasy
that lead to movies like Krull
(1983) and the Lou Ferrigno Hercules
(1983). You also had movies that were more inspired by fairy tales like Ladyhawke (1985) and of course the
wonderful Princess Bride (1987).
Even Arthurian legends got a new coat of paint with the dreamlike Excalibur (1981) and Sean Connery as
the sparkly Green Knight in Sword of the
Valiant (1984).
"I know I dropped my eight sided dice somewhere." |
Eventually the interest in
fantasy films died down. While many of the low budget ones did all right on
home video and cable, big studios were losing money. Films like Willow (1988) necessitated a lot of
money for visual effects, costumes, location shooting and even with big names
behind the camera (Ron Howard directing a story conceived of by George Lucas)
they movie just didn’t make as much money as they wanted. This was really the
last hurrah for the fantasy boom of the 1980s, and the genre once again sunk
into the mists of time outshone by cheaper to make action flicks.
Hard to say which one is making the goofier face. |
Don't mess with the Barbarian Queen! |
I think the series Game of Thrones also fits in here. It's also quite successful and has many fans. Even the movie Reign of Fire has some connection to the fantasy, SF genre, and a decent enough watch. The 80s did have their fair share and I have Conan and the first Beastmaster on DVD. Some of Howard's heroes even made it into the 90s like Kull the Conqueror (a flop for the most part), and later Solomon Kane (which I enjoyed).
ReplyDeleteBut there were some TV series that kept the fires burning as well like Hercules with Kevin Sorbo and Xena: Warrior Princess with Lucy Lawless. There was even a BBC series called Merlin, which I'd watch from time to time. The animated Pixar movies, How to Train Your Dragon is fun too.
Oh yeah "Game of Thrones" is certainly the next level of fantasy entertainment on television. The fanbase is huge, and may even be bigger than the movie audience for the Lord of the Rings films in the early 2000s.
DeleteI need to check out those other two Howard films. I read the Solomon Kane stories a few years back for the first time and they were pretty entertaining. I can see how a fun flick could be made from them.
Yeah I almost mentioned the Hercules and Xena shows, but they were just out of the range of the Barbarian Age in my book, more rooted in the 1990s. But you make a good point, fantasy seemed to hang in there on television through that decade. I know quite a few folks who loved those series. I never really got into them.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYeah, the Solomon Kane movie isn't exactly a fun film, it's pretty drab really, but I thought it caught the atmosphere of the character pretty well by being so. He always seemed to be the introspective, dark type character.
ReplyDeleteAnother Howard movie to catch though more a biography is The Whole Wide World. I thought it was handled well.
Impressive FX are cool and all, but they aren't essential -- and they definitely aren't enough. In a related way, I enjoy much 50s scifi with big bugs, obvious backscreens, stop-action disembodied brains, and so on. 80s fantasy flicks are simply fun -- even the bad ones.
ReplyDeleteI'm in total agreement with you. A movie can be entertaining in many ways. Some of them intended, others not intended.
Delete