This is one of those movie
scores that made an impact. Not only did Thomas Newman’s music fit the film
perfectly, but it also ended up becoming the
style for quirky comedy/dramas for the next decade or so. As such, the
style has worn a bit thin for film score fans. But hearing it in context makes
it seem fresh again. The music tends toward atmospheric, not really having a
theme, but creating the perfect mood. It’s very delicate at times and can even
be relaxing. Here’s the opening track Dead Already, offering a bit of everything Newman include in the
score.
In depth and mini reviews of movies with a sprinkling of nostalgia and film music musings.
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Sunday, April 7, 2013
Explorers (1985)
Fresh of the success of Gremlins, director Joe Dante decided to
switch gears a bit. He made a family adventure film about a group of kids who
meets an alien and go on an incredible adventure. Most folks expected something
along the lines of the immensely popular E.T.
but Dante never does anything by the book. Was this flick going to end up more
like a prototype for Super 8?
Summary:
Ben (Ethan Hawke) is a bit
of a dreamer and outcast at school. He spends most of his free time watching
old sci-fi films (like War of the Worlds
and This Island Earth) on TV and
thinking about being an astronaut. One night he has an amazing dream about a bizarre
circuit board. He is able to draw most of the image and give it to his best
friend Wolfgang (River Phoenix). With a name like that you know Wolfgang is a
budding scientist and by combining his Commodore 64 with the drawing they two
create a strange kind of spherical force field.
The two boys meet up with
Darren (Jason Presson) a local tough kid, who helps them out with some bullies.
The three pool resources, Ben’s dreams, Wolfgang’s scientific knowledge and
Darren’s access to a local junkyard to create a vehicle capable of space
travel. It’s good thing too, because Ben is becoming more and more convinced
that the dreams are coming from an extraterrestrial intelligence and are an
invitation to make first contact. But just what kind of alien will our young Explorers encounter?
Good Points:
- Solid performance by all three child leads.
- Has a real spirit of adventure and wonder
- Jerry Goldsmith’s musical score is a perfect fit for the film
Bad Points:
- Some may find the 80’s optimism and wonder to be cliché
- The alien encounter is going to ruin the movie for some people
- The final message of the movie isn’t going to work for everyone
Overall:
In a way this movie was
ahead of its time. It starts off as a conventional kids adventure flick like E.T. or Goonies, but the final 30 minutes take into a movie that could have
come from the 90s or 00s. Expectations are subverted and you’re provided with a
surprise that will annoy some and make others snicker. But Dante has always had
a bit of a dark sense of humor (Gremlins
is one dark little movie if you think about it). For me, the first two
thirds are excellent and the finale is rough but entertaining. Maybe with
another pass or two of the script the anti-Spielberg-ian feel could have been a
bit cleaner.
Scores
(out of 5)
Visuals: 4
Sound: 4
Acting: 4
Script: 4
Music: 5
Direction: 3
Entertainment: 4
Total: 4
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
The Hole (2009)
Introduction:
Director Joe Dante was part
of the group of directors from the 1980s that created some of the key films
from my childhood. Gremlins, Explorers even
Twilight Zone: The Movie. And though
he is also known for his love of classic monster flicks and penchant toward
Looney Tunes, he also created some interesting and unique family entertainment.
When I heard his latest flick had been shelved for a couple years before release,
I wondered what happened?
Summary:
Dane (Chris Massoglia) and
his little brother Lucas (Nathan Gamble) have moved to a small suburban town
with their mom Susan (Teri Polo). Dane is pretty annoyed by the whole thing
until he notices the very cute next-door neighbor Julie (Haley Bennett). After
some awkward attempts to strike up a conversation (his little brother has no
problems with it, much to Dane’s annoyance), the three start hanging out.
That’s when they discover
the bizarre trap door in the basement. The kids open it and discover a literal
abyss yawning before them. They attempt several experiments to see how deep the
chasm delves and what could be inside. Julie reveals that the former owner, now
known as Creepy Carl (Bruce Dern) went crazy in the house and moved out after
several incidents. Very quickly all three kids learn just what kind of
incidents these could be. Disturbing visions start haunting the three,
including a ghostly girl, a horrific clown puppet and Dane’s abusive father who
seems to be free from prison. And now that the door is open, there seems to be
no way to close and keep whatever is inside The Hole from coming out.
Good Points:
- Balances laughs and scares fairly well
- The clown puppet is a horrifying creation
- All three kids feel authentic and help pull in the viewer
Bad Points:
- Yes it’s a horror film, but don’t expect blood, boobs or anything in that vein
- Sometimes the creative moments don’t quite connect that way they were intended to
- The ghost girl feels a bit similar to the typical Japanese ghost girl we are overly familiar with
Overall:
One thing about Joe Dante is
that he always tries to bring something a bit different to his movies. This is
no exception. PG-13 horror usually means a de-fanged slasher flick or Twilight rip off. Instead, Dante crafts
a family friendly horror film. The humor comes form the character relationships
(the banter and rough housing between the brothers, the awkward teen boy trying
to talk to the teen girl, etc.) and some solid jump scares and creepy moments.
Some of the resolutions don’t quite have the impact they are supposed to and I
can’t put my finger on why they don’t work. But all in all it’s an entertaining
film with likable characters and one creepy ass clown puppet. That thing gave
me the shivers.
Scores
(out of 5)
Visuals: 4
Sound: 3
Acting: 4
Script: 3
Music: 4
Direction: 4
Entertainment: 4
Total: 4
Curious about a full review,
sent me an email and I’ll make additional thoughts to this review.
Sunday, March 31, 2013
Time of the Apes (1974) - MST3K Review
Summary:
It’s a happy morning for two
school children Johnny (Masaaki Kaji) and Caroline (Hiroko Saito). They are
going to visit their uncle’s top-secret laboratory and learn about his project
dealing with cryogenics. Assistant Catherine (Reiko Tokunaga) shows the kids
around the laboratory, finally stopping in the room with the freezing pods.
Wouldn’t you know it, the local volcano erupts and sends the three into the
pods as the only safe place. Quicker than you can say Popsicle, they are frozen
and awake to find themselves in a world where Apes have evolved into men!
They escape a laboratory and
make for Green Mountain, where they encounter a lone human named Godo (Tetsuya
Ushio) who decides to help them. Along the way they meet the helpful ape child
Pepe (Kazue Takita) and attempt to escape the evil Chief Gebar (Baku
Hatakeyama). What follows are chases, escapes, deception, double crosses, a
flying saucer and a startling revelation that could change everything. Will
Johnny, Caroline and Catherine ever escape from the Time of the Apes?
Movie Review:
![]() |
| Chief Gebar pretends he's General Patton. |
When it comes to science
fiction movie milestones there are always a certain set of films that get
mentioned. One of those is Planet of the Apes, the film that pitted Charleton Heston against gun toting ape-men. Of
course there was a whole lot more going on in it, including some social
commentary that helped turn the first film into a classic (the sequels… not so
much). It’s not hard to imagine that this film inspired moviemakers across the
globe. This is one of those “inspired” films.
Well let’s back up a bit.
This is another one of those “movies” that is really a severely edited version
of a television show. The series was called Saru no Gundan translated to “Army of the Apes” which actually fits
the film pretty well. This series ran for 26 episodes each about 30 minutes
long. That means a story that ran for 780 minutes is condensed down to roughly
97 minutes of a “movie”. The end result just barely manages to make any sense
at all.
Yes, Time of the Apes was brought to us by Sandy Frank - the same
gentleman who brought us Fugitive Alien and
the Gamera translations. On the one
hand you want to thank him for exposing us to some classic Japanese films and
series. On the other, you wonder if the hack job on these was worth it. With so
much editing, chopping and jumping around, the movie plays like a fever dream
of endless chases and escapes. You loose track of why the characters are doing
anything, and just sit there thinking, “Well it’s all going to make sense in
the end, right?” And in some warped surreal way it does all make sense. But it
requires the logical mind to shut down and bask in the ape fantasy that abounds
in front of you.
![]() |
| Caroline, Johnny and Catherine awake to an ape filled time. |
Visually Time of the Apes looks like what you’d
expect from a television series from the 1970s with a limited budget attempting
to mimic Planet of the Apes. Most of
the ape-men end up looking pretty hilarious in masks that don’t flex of bend
correctly for speaking purposes. There’s lots of ridiculous pantomime combined
with some hilarious outfits. Some of the apes are dressed like Japanese humans
of the 1970s. So Pepe is running around in jeans and sneakers, while Chief
Gebar appears to be modeled after General Patton. Then there are the apes wearing
elaborate fop outfits, or dressed like Colonel Sanders.
The style of the film is
also typical of the period. You get lots of crazy editing, rapid-fire zooms and
frantic action scenes. It keeps things exciting, sure, but it also adds to the
confusion. If anything, the film seems a bit ahead of its time with the speed
at which it moves. It’s hard to tell if this was part of the production in 1974
or the editing job in 1987.
Mostly the dubbing is pretty
god awful, but in truth you only really notice it when the humans are speaking.
The ape masks are so poor that no matter what language they are speaking, the
dubbing would look off. Those mouths barely move. The dub voice actors are
mostly of the over the top variety, with Chief Gebar chewing the audio scenery.
The gasping and moaning sounds as perverse as it normally does, but that is
expected in dubs from this era.
![]() |
| Pepe: ape-boy, ape-girl or owl? |
I did like the zesty peppy
music used in Time of the Apes.
There’s some cool 70s guitar work in there as well as some very prog sounding synths.
Although some of it was tracked very poorly. Peppy music is synched to dramatic
or tense scenes and vice versa. This happened in Fugitive Alien as well, so I suspect that this may have been a side
effect of the poor dubbing job. But then again, who knows for sure.
Also difficult to judge is
the acting in general. You can tell this is a show aimed at kids, so things are
played pretty broadly. The pantomiming apes and overly expressive children can
be ridiculous at times. And combined with the poor dubbing it is just a
hilarious mess.
Even without Mystery Science
Theater on board, this movie would be a blast to watch. It moves quickly, is
filled to bursting with odd visuals and has plenty of action, running and
hiding to keep you interested. As long as you don’t try to figure out what is
going on, a viewer has a prime riffing feature to enjoy. But why not let Joel
and the bots to the heavy lifting here.
Episode Review:
![]() |
| Godo attempts to protect the only other humans |
Season three of the series
was known for it’s Japanese films and the great riffing they got. Time of the Apes is really one of my
favorites. I think I enjoy Fugitive
Alien a tiny bit more, but only because the story makes a tiny bit more
sense.
This movie was actually
riffed on twice by the crew. The first time was during the KTMA run of the
show. Everyone remembered how much fun they had with the show, so they asked Comedy
Central to get the rights. They tackled this one fairly early in the season and
really seemed to be firing on all cylinders.
Everything is game for them,
from the hilarious dubbing and editing, to the costumes and odd plot
contrivances. Katherine, Johnny and Caroline do a lot of ducking into hallways
and hiding and alcoves. The ape troops walk right by and never see them. After
a while Joel wonders “Doesn’t anyone have peripheral vision in this movies?”
![]() |
| Chief Gebar wants you to make his day. |
They also work “monkey” and
“ape” into many of the riffs turning this into a very punny episode. On a quick
zoom up to Godo as he aims a gun at the ape troops Tom says, “Steven Segal in
‘Shock the Monkey’”. Or when a
guard is knocked senseless by Godo in a later scene Crow quips, “It’s bed time
for Bonzo.” There’s also an entire bevy of poop flinging jokes. One of my
favorites is as the ape president drives up to his headquarters; there are a
whole mess of soldiers out front that snap to attention. Tom wonders if they
will offer a 21-crap salute.
Early in Time of the Apes when Johnny’s mother
worries about the minor tremor might lead to a bigger quake, she whines and
asks Johnny not to go to the lab with Caroline. Johnny turns to his mother and
is dubbed in a perky peppy way saying, “I don’t care!” This inspires endless
running jokes offering Johnny plenty of things he should care about, or having
him answer “I don’t care” to just about anything. I love when Johnny triggers a
trap on Green Mountain and is about to be skewered. Joel says, “I bet you care
now!”
Really that’s only the tip
of the iceberg. This episode is packed with classic riffing. One of my favorite
sequences is a single minute of zooms, gasps, moans and more zooms. The boys
riff this perfectly. I wasn’t able to find just that scene, but watch the first
minute of the clip below to see that sequence. It’s easily one of the
highlights of season 3.
![]() |
| Crow is supposed be Spencer Tracy as Clarence Darrow. |
The host segments are pretty
fun. Things start off with Joel and the bots attempting to play some baseball.
But it all goes wrong when they break and window and create a hull breach. For
the invention exchange, Joel creates the cellulite phone. This pink phone
expands as you order take out to remind you to stay on your diet. The mad
scientists create the Miracle Grow Baby Formula that will grow your baby faster
in less time. It works too well. At the first break, Joel and bots present a
short film about why Johnny doesn’t care. It’s gets pretty dark actually. The
next break goes silly, as Joel and the bots attempt to recreate the Scopes
Monkey Trial from Inherit the Wind. A
standee of Judge Wapner is a special guest. The fashions of the apes inspire
Crow to present spring fashions based on the film. It’s pretty hilarious stuff.
When the film ends, Joel and the bots sing a song based on the music of the end
credits. It describes about how “Sandy Frank is the source of our pain”.
Time of the Apes is one of the best episodes of Season three and well worth seeking out.
The fast paced movie, combined with some excellent riffing and fun host
segments make this one of my favorite episodes from the Comedy Central years.
I give it five ape filled
zooms out of five.
This episode is available on Mystery Science Theater 3000: Volume XXII.
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Ghost in the Shell (1995)
Introduction:
When this film came out in
1995 there was a strong belief that it would be the game changer for Japanese
animation in North America. The film was going to generate word of mouth and end
up a smash hit. Folks would be lining up to see it and anime would be lifted
from the stigma of being ultraviolent almost porn for adults. Well it didn’t
quite turn out that way. It would take a few more years and a little show
called Pokemon to do that. Instead, Ghost in the Shell became a cult
favorite for film buffs, and an excellent science fiction film that anime fans
loved diving into.
Summary:
In the near future Major
Motoko Kusanagi (Mimi Woods) is in charge of a Special Forces unit that fights
cybernetic terrorists. To deal with this technological threat, her team is
comprised of heavy artillery, cutting edge technology and even full cyborg
bodies. They finds themselves up against a very dangerous criminal who calls
himself the Puppet Master (Abe Lasser).
The Puppet Master can hack
into people’s brains and use them as pawns to achieve his ends. Kusanagi’s team
does their best to track down the real criminal, but keep running into puppets
and dead ends. When a break in the case occurs, clues point to another
government agency possibly at work behind the puppet master. Kusanagi will have
to use all her skills to determine the identity of The Ghost in the Shell.
Good Points:
- A thought provoking science fiction story
- Impressive visuals in both the action scenes and quiet moments
- Never plays down to the audience
Bad Points:
- Can get a touch over-philosophical
- Moves at a very slow pace
- A combination of violence and nudity (but no sex) will alienate some viewers
Overall:
Any fans of thinking science
fiction films need to see Ghost in the
Shell. A single viewing is enough to get the story and basic ideas down,
but the film rewards multiple viewings with its depth of visuals and
atmosphere. Those looking for lots of action will be disappointed. But the film
is certainly a landmark for animation in the 1990s and inspired many anime
series and films like The Matrix.
Scores
(out of 5)
Visuals: 5
Sound: 5
Acting: 3
Script: 4
Music: 4
Direction: 5
Entertainment: 5
Total: 5
In Depth Review
![]() |
| Major Kusanagi about to jump into action. |
I’ll touch on the key points
on why this film remains on my top ten science fiction film list.
There are two main
contributors to the film. Masamune Shirow created the original graphic novel
that this movie is based on. Then you have Mamoru Oshii, the director who has a
very unique visual style and sense of pacing. In the end you get a combination
of Shirow’s world though Oshii’s eyes. The result works surprisingly well.
Shirow’s wacky sense of humor is toned down but Oshii took key elements from
the graphic novel and used them for the main plot of the film. This makes the
film version of Ghost in the Shell very
different from the original manga and the television series that came
afterward.
![]() |
| Was the puppet captured or is this the master? |
This contrasts with the
action scenes in Ghost in the Shell
where Oshii keeps things moving. There are three set pieces in the film. You
have the opening sequence with the assassination of a diplomat that literally
explodes in several different ways. The next sequence involves the chasing a
hacker who uses armor piercing rounds and has camouflage that renders him
invisible. There’s some good tension building here as the hacker attempts to elude
his pursuers. The final sequence involves Major Kusanagi attempting to stop a
cyborg tank with minimal weapons and no back up.
Each scene combines fast
action with long takes and slow pans. Creating a disconnect that actual makes
the tension work well. Kusanagi’s battle against the tank is intense. It
becomes apparent that she has almost no chance of surviving. There are moments
when the screen seems to remain static as the tank waits for her next attack
and all he we hear is the rain falling and the atmospheric musical score.
![]() |
| Water and grime in the futuristic cityscape |
Water imagery is abundant in
the film. The opening scene features windows that appear to be a giant
aquarium. The opening credits show the creation of a cyborg with the body being
created while immersed in fluid. Following scenes feature rainfall, sanding
puddles, not to mention scenes occurring on boats. As I mentioned it creates a
melancholy feel to the film, but there’s also a thematic idea here. The term
“flow of information” is used several times in the film. The constant motion of
the water, and its ever-present state mirror the idea of information
surrounding us and flowing between us. Or maybe there is other symbolism here
that I’m not aware of.
![]() |
| Kusanagi reflects literally and figuratively |
Sound work in Ghost in the Shell is solid and
immersive as well. Most of what you hear is standard city noise, rainfall and
the hum of computers. Actions scenes us a solid variety of sounds for the
gunfire, explosions and cyborg hand to hand combat. It doesn’t stand out as
anything too innovative, but it creates a familiar world, just a short jog into
the our future
![]() |
| The cyborg tank rages against the machine |
In addition there is a song
used three times in the film. I blogged a little about it here. It’s very
unique in style and has been known to annoy the hell out of some viewers. But
to me it adds to the character of the film. It also changes slightly each time
it is used, reaching its most complete form in the end credits.
![]() |
| Bateau shares beer and philosophy with Kusanagi |
The script is also slightly
different between the two versions. Viewing the film in English first will
allow a viewer who isn’t fluent in Japanese to absorb the visuals as well as
the story. But the translation is different enough from the subtitled version
to cause some viewers concern about which is the closest to the original
version. The Japanese version seems a bit more oblique in some ways, and yet
feels truer to the spirit of the film. The English version seems like it was
made to cater to a more action movie oriented crowd. It is fair to say that the
dialogue in both versions contains sequences that seem out of place, but will
end up having an impact later in the story. One of my favorite examples is a
conversation between Kusanagi and one of her team members. They talk about how
cyborgs are limited by their artificial bodies. They can act according to the
peramiters set by the manufacturers. A pure human is not limited in that way,
and provides a necessary variable in the team, keeping the whole unit effective
and unpredictable. This mirrors a conversation between the Puppet Master and
Kusanagi at the end of the film.
![]() |
| The Major melts into the world around her |
Ghost in the Shell 2.0 (2008)
![]() |
| Everything you see here is computer generated. |
Well the answer is yes and
no.
For the most part Ghost in the Shell 2.0 is the same film
as the 1995 version. It flows the same way, has all the same scenes, tells the
same story and explores the same themes. And yet the experience is slightly
different in its updated version.
Two big changes were made.
One was the addition of computer-generated sequences replacing two
traditionally animated sequences. All the shots, angles, and imagery are
exactly the same. The CG additions also spread to the computer screen and
virtual reality interfaces used in the film. These have been replaced by more
dynamic visuals, ones that look closer to the images used in the follow up film
Innocence.
I don’t mind the updates to
the computer screens and VR interfaces. What looked high tech in 1995 does look
a bit simplistic and dated now. But that is always a problem with any science
fiction film that focuses on technology. It doesn’t hurt the story of flow, so
it’s just a simple change.
Now the replacement of
sequences with CG counterparts is a bit tougher to reconcile. I believe this
was done for two reasons. They wanted to make the cityscape shots and vehicle
scenes look more realistic with computer images. And second, they figured they
might was well throw in a CG Kusanagi in there for funsies.
![]() |
| A new life form looks upon a Tang colored world. |
But the result is an odd
disconnect between this full CG version of Kusanagi in two scenes to the hand
drawn version in the rest of the film. It leaves the viewer wondering what
happened, instead of pulling the viewer into the story and the world. The
film’s chilly style can be a turnoff for some viewers, but this strangeness
might be the nail in the coffin for some viewers, who will end up focusing on
the reasons behind the switch in animation styles, instead of the story and
themes.
The other change is
something that seems small, but actually affects the tone of the film. The 1995
film used lots of blues, dark greens and purples to create a cool color pallet.
In the update, oranges and yellows have replaces nearly all the light and
computer screens in the film. I think this was to match the look closer to Innocence. Unfortunately this adds a
warmth to the film that feels out of place. The coolness of the overtly
technological world fits this vision better. It’s not a deal breaker, but it
feels wrong especially when you’ve seen the 1995 version first.
I suggest starting with the
original cut from 1995. Check out the 2.0 upgrade if you’re curious.
Labels:
1995,
Animation,
Anime,
Ghost in the Shell,
Mamoru Oshii
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Anime Juke Box - Ghost City - Ghost in the Shell
When it comes to Ghost in the Shell, the score by Kenji Kawai is mostly atmospheric, atonal material. It does a great job creating mood in the film, but isn't something you sit back and enjoy at home.
However, the vocal piece used three times in the film is one of the most memorable tracks of anime music of the 1990s. This song comes in three different lengths, with slight variations of tempo, and vocal accompaniment. Each time it is used, we are allowed to focus on images and the music without dialogue: opening credits, mid-movie montage and end credits. It is performed in an archaic Japanese style that contrasts vividly with high tech images on screen - and yet it reaches to the core of the ancient question. Who am I?
Here is the version used during the mid-film montage, called "Ghost City".
Labels:
Anime,
Ghost in the Shell,
Kenji Kawai,
Movie Music
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Nostalgia Nugget - Welcome to the Jungle
A couple years ago I tried to figure out if the adventure genre film was dead. That blog was inspired by reviewing the Tarzan movies. I managed to see Tarzan the Ape Man a few days after revisiting Raiders of the Lost Ark.
Now that I've wrapped up eight Tarzan flicks from the Weissmuller era, I was wondering, what happened to all the jungle flicks? Was this a product of the time, or is Tarzan like Sherlock Holmes and Dracula - we'll just keep seeing reincarnations of these flicks time and again.
The answer seems to be, a bit of both actually.
Jungle films seemed to be a staple of Hollywood from the the 1920s all the way up to the 1950s or so. After a while, people just weren't coming in droves to see what happens in darkest Africa when you send some guys in pith helmets to search for fortune and glory. Tarzan films were a dime a dozen at the time. Sure Weissmuller was the most popular, but you also had Lex Barker and Gordon Scott playing the role after Weissmuller left. There were also classics like Jungle Goddess from 1948 and Queen of the Amazons from 1947.
But the jungle flick had pretty much disappeared by the time I was heading to the movies. There wasn't room for these types of films in the experimental 60s or gritty 70s. Escapism has pretty much been cornered by James Bond, and the closest he got the jungle was in Live and Let Die.
I think part of it was that the darkness of Africa was no longer considered a frontier. Instead, the news was showing us the all to grim realities of Africa, and the romance was effectively shattered. On top of that, the treatment of the native people could no longer be reduced to the classic timid baggage carriers and blood thirsty cannibals. Jungle movies just couldn't survive in that type of environment.
That did not kill Tarzan. It seems like every decade gets a film or two about Burrough's most famous creation. Partially, I think it is because the Weissmuller films did create a powerful impression on people. Hell, I think most folks can identify the Tarzan call, even if they've never seen a Tarzan movie from the '30s or '40s. But Tarzan is seen as a recognizable name, something that may pull people in. Because if Tarzan promises anything, it's a muscular guy running around in a loincloth.
One of the big catalysts for a group of jungle flicks was the huge box office for Raiders of the Lost Ark in 1981. Not only did this film influence a bunch of low budget immitations. But it also forced James Bond to switch gears, leading to the very Indiana Jones styled Octopussy. But suddenly, the old fashioned adventure film seemed like it could bring in the bucks, and why not just resurrect the most classic of these films.
That brought us the wonderfully ridiculous Tarzan the Ape Man (also 1981) with Bo Derek as Jane, and none other than Miles O'Keeffe as the shirtless wonder himself. O'Keeffe would go on to play Ator in films like Cave Dwellers but really Tarzan is an afterthought in this movie. Mostly it's about director John Derek filming his wife Bo in as many stages of undress as he could. Oh and John Philip Law is in the film too, and if memory serves he's only slightly more subtle here than he was in Space Mutiny.
If you must check out a Tarzan flick from the 1980s, then go for the interesting Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan. This movie gives us an origin story for Tarzan and plays the whole thing very straight. Christopher Lambert does a solid job as the ape man. But the film also includes roles for Ian Holm and Ralph Richardson. The movie ends up being more of a drama, than a typical jungle adventure, but its an interesting twist on the story.
But if you really want some laughable fun (and the thought of Bo Derek running around half naked just isn't working for you). Then you can always go for the hilariously silly Sheena from 1984. Future Bond girl Tanya Roberts galavants around summoning animals and saving the jungle from evil white mercenaries. While it sticks close to the spirit of Tarzan, the entire thing is mostly cheesecake, hilarious acting and a bad movie lovers dream come true.
By the time the 1990s rolled around, the jungle movie was gone again. But there was a small exception. Again it was because of Spielberg and one of his blockbusters. Jurassic Park was a huge hit in 1993, and it made the work of writer Michael Crichton hot. Many of his books were rushed into theaters during the '90s including Sphere, Disclosure, Rising Sun and The 13th Warrior (which was an adaptation of his novel Eaters of the Dead). None of them quite met the popularity of the his dinosaurs run amok story.
One of the films was Congo in 1995. This flick actually sticks pretty close to the classic jungle movie mold. You've got your white hunters penetrating the jungle searching for treasure. While the book itself was a fun read, the translation to screen was ridiculous. You have scenes with a gorilla using sign language to speak, which is based on fact. But in the film she wears what looks like the old Nintendo Power Glove, that translates her sign language into a digitized voice. Combine that with a wonderful scene of Laura Linney blowing away guys in ape suits with a laser cannon and you've got riffing gold.
In an odd twist of fate it was Disney who brought us a Tarzan flick for the '90s. Their animated adaptation of Burroghs book was promoted by the use of cutting edge computer animation (for 1999), Rosie O'Donnell as the voice of a pompadoured ape, and songs by Phil Collins. At the time of it's release, the film was well received, but these days seems to be one of the forgotten films form Disney's animated cannon.
Actually this wasn't the last of the Tarzan incarnations. 1998 gave us Tarzan and the Lost City. Supposedly closer to the Burroughs novels than any of the previous incarnations, we get Casper Van Dein (of Starship Troopers fame). While this was probably timed to preempt the Disney film (and grab some of it's potential income), the film wasn't much more than a blip in the box office and home video. Once again it appeared that Tarzan was well and truly dead.
Except now I'm hearing that there is a new Tarzan flick in the works, one that will start off a whole new franchise if it is successful. I'm not sure if the creators are hoping the hard bombing of John Carter was just a fluke, or if this got scuttled because of the failure of that Burroughs property. What it boils down to is that the ape man may be immortal. If so, that means the jungle adventure movie may once again return to the big screen.
And for your enjoyment, one of my favorite ridiculous scenes from Congo. I love how Jerry Goldsmith's score is working overtime to make this whole thing less silly than it really is.
Now that I've wrapped up eight Tarzan flicks from the Weissmuller era, I was wondering, what happened to all the jungle flicks? Was this a product of the time, or is Tarzan like Sherlock Holmes and Dracula - we'll just keep seeing reincarnations of these flicks time and again.
The answer seems to be, a bit of both actually.
Jungle films seemed to be a staple of Hollywood from the the 1920s all the way up to the 1950s or so. After a while, people just weren't coming in droves to see what happens in darkest Africa when you send some guys in pith helmets to search for fortune and glory. Tarzan films were a dime a dozen at the time. Sure Weissmuller was the most popular, but you also had Lex Barker and Gordon Scott playing the role after Weissmuller left. There were also classics like Jungle Goddess from 1948 and Queen of the Amazons from 1947.
But the jungle flick had pretty much disappeared by the time I was heading to the movies. There wasn't room for these types of films in the experimental 60s or gritty 70s. Escapism has pretty much been cornered by James Bond, and the closest he got the jungle was in Live and Let Die.
I think part of it was that the darkness of Africa was no longer considered a frontier. Instead, the news was showing us the all to grim realities of Africa, and the romance was effectively shattered. On top of that, the treatment of the native people could no longer be reduced to the classic timid baggage carriers and blood thirsty cannibals. Jungle movies just couldn't survive in that type of environment.
That did not kill Tarzan. It seems like every decade gets a film or two about Burrough's most famous creation. Partially, I think it is because the Weissmuller films did create a powerful impression on people. Hell, I think most folks can identify the Tarzan call, even if they've never seen a Tarzan movie from the '30s or '40s. But Tarzan is seen as a recognizable name, something that may pull people in. Because if Tarzan promises anything, it's a muscular guy running around in a loincloth.
One of the big catalysts for a group of jungle flicks was the huge box office for Raiders of the Lost Ark in 1981. Not only did this film influence a bunch of low budget immitations. But it also forced James Bond to switch gears, leading to the very Indiana Jones styled Octopussy. But suddenly, the old fashioned adventure film seemed like it could bring in the bucks, and why not just resurrect the most classic of these films.
That brought us the wonderfully ridiculous Tarzan the Ape Man (also 1981) with Bo Derek as Jane, and none other than Miles O'Keeffe as the shirtless wonder himself. O'Keeffe would go on to play Ator in films like Cave Dwellers but really Tarzan is an afterthought in this movie. Mostly it's about director John Derek filming his wife Bo in as many stages of undress as he could. Oh and John Philip Law is in the film too, and if memory serves he's only slightly more subtle here than he was in Space Mutiny.If you must check out a Tarzan flick from the 1980s, then go for the interesting Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan. This movie gives us an origin story for Tarzan and plays the whole thing very straight. Christopher Lambert does a solid job as the ape man. But the film also includes roles for Ian Holm and Ralph Richardson. The movie ends up being more of a drama, than a typical jungle adventure, but its an interesting twist on the story.
But if you really want some laughable fun (and the thought of Bo Derek running around half naked just isn't working for you). Then you can always go for the hilariously silly Sheena from 1984. Future Bond girl Tanya Roberts galavants around summoning animals and saving the jungle from evil white mercenaries. While it sticks close to the spirit of Tarzan, the entire thing is mostly cheesecake, hilarious acting and a bad movie lovers dream come true.
By the time the 1990s rolled around, the jungle movie was gone again. But there was a small exception. Again it was because of Spielberg and one of his blockbusters. Jurassic Park was a huge hit in 1993, and it made the work of writer Michael Crichton hot. Many of his books were rushed into theaters during the '90s including Sphere, Disclosure, Rising Sun and The 13th Warrior (which was an adaptation of his novel Eaters of the Dead). None of them quite met the popularity of the his dinosaurs run amok story.
One of the films was Congo in 1995. This flick actually sticks pretty close to the classic jungle movie mold. You've got your white hunters penetrating the jungle searching for treasure. While the book itself was a fun read, the translation to screen was ridiculous. You have scenes with a gorilla using sign language to speak, which is based on fact. But in the film she wears what looks like the old Nintendo Power Glove, that translates her sign language into a digitized voice. Combine that with a wonderful scene of Laura Linney blowing away guys in ape suits with a laser cannon and you've got riffing gold. In an odd twist of fate it was Disney who brought us a Tarzan flick for the '90s. Their animated adaptation of Burroghs book was promoted by the use of cutting edge computer animation (for 1999), Rosie O'Donnell as the voice of a pompadoured ape, and songs by Phil Collins. At the time of it's release, the film was well received, but these days seems to be one of the forgotten films form Disney's animated cannon.
Actually this wasn't the last of the Tarzan incarnations. 1998 gave us Tarzan and the Lost City. Supposedly closer to the Burroughs novels than any of the previous incarnations, we get Casper Van Dein (of Starship Troopers fame). While this was probably timed to preempt the Disney film (and grab some of it's potential income), the film wasn't much more than a blip in the box office and home video. Once again it appeared that Tarzan was well and truly dead.Except now I'm hearing that there is a new Tarzan flick in the works, one that will start off a whole new franchise if it is successful. I'm not sure if the creators are hoping the hard bombing of John Carter was just a fluke, or if this got scuttled because of the failure of that Burroughs property. What it boils down to is that the ape man may be immortal. If so, that means the jungle adventure movie may once again return to the big screen.
And for your enjoyment, one of my favorite ridiculous scenes from Congo. I love how Jerry Goldsmith's score is working overtime to make this whole thing less silly than it really is.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)























